Home > Planning > Planning Policy

PLEASE NOTE: You only need to register / login if you wish to make representations.

If you haven't got an account you can register now.
If you have forgotten your password you can request a new password.

You can view the full details of a representation by clicking either on the Representation ID in the top right of the summary box or on the More Details... link at the bottom.

Representations on BMSDC Joint Local Plan Consultation Document (Interactive) - Q57

Representation ID: 12938

COMMENT Suffolk County Council (Mr. Robert Feakes)

Summary:

In order to be sound, the plan should clearly set out strategic and development management policies that ensure that the local and national/international significance of heritage assets can be understood in decision-making processes. The plan should also set out polices for decision-making which avoids or mitigates direct impacts and impacts on the setting of designated and non-designated heritage assets, by requirements on scheme designs, or planning conditions and obligations where appropriate. Archaeological assets are finite and should be protected. Additionally, engagement with archaeological remains and heritage assets can enrich communities. Historic England's Good Practice Advice notes 1-3 should be consulted.

More details about Rep ID: 12938

Representation ID: 12676

COMMENT Mr Bryan Fawcett

Summary:

The JLP refers to the 'Heritage Settlement and Landscape Sensitivity Assessment'. This will apparently identify areas where 'development can enhance the landscape'. But it is incomplete and nothing, not even the defining criteria, has been disclosed. This has the potential to be a ticking rural development time bomb.

More details about Rep ID: 12676

Representation ID: 12612

OBJECT Mr Alastair Powell

Summary:

* The JLP refers to the 'Heritage Settlement and Landscape Sensitivity Assessment'. This will apparently identify areas where 'development can enhance the landscape'. But it is incomplete and nothing, not even the defining criteria, has been disclosed. Comment on any aspect of development in landscape areas is pointless when we don't know what is being proposed.

* Therfore the only acceptable option is the continued use of the SLA and other visual local landscape designations to be robustly applied, which has not been the case during the last LP.

More details about Rep ID: 12612

Representation ID: 12417

COMMENT Old Newton Parish Council (Mrs Karen Price)

Summary:

We need to ensure our heritage areas and assets are protected and if threatened comprehensive public consultation to judge strength of public opinion.

More details about Rep ID: 12417

Representation ID: 12112

COMMENT Gladman (Mr Richard Crosthwaite)

Summary:

The Council should refer specifically to paragraphs 133 and 134 of the Framework, which set out the need to assess the significance of a designated heritage assets and where there is less than substantial harm, this should be weighed against the public benefits of the proposal. Where there is deemed to be substantial harm, then the proposal would need to achieve substantial public benefits to outweigh that harm.

More details about Rep ID: 12112

Representation ID: 11955

COMMENT Fieldens Ltd represented by Boyer Planning (Mr. James Bailey)

Summary:

The Councils should support development which seeks to preserve and, in particular, enhance the setting of designated assets, in accordance with National Policy and specifically in respect of Paragraph 126 of the NPPF set out above.

In line with this and in respect of the proposed development of the land off Starhouse Lane, Onehouse, we consider that support should be given to future planning applications that seek to preserve and enhance Grade ll listed buildings into a viable use.

However a well-designed and sympathetic development can enhance the setting of a designated asset to help to ensure that it is preserved and improved into the future. This balance must be considered when development is proposed on or near designated heritage assets.

More details about Rep ID: 11955

Representation ID: 11840

COMMENT Amber REI represented by Pegasus Group (Mr David Onions)

Summary:

The joint Local Plan should make specific recognition of the need for the redevelopment of the industrial site associated with Haughley Park in order to significantly improve the setting of the Grade I listed building. A heritage assessment has been prepared by the site owners which has identified the significant benefits associated with a residential development of the site. This allocation should recognise that the factory premises involved extends to a greater area than just the factory buildings closest to the Grade I listed building. In addition it should be recognised that to provide a viable proposal to allow both for the removal of the existing buildings, remediation of the existing land and a sensitively designed new residential development is likely to require all of the site including the greenfield portion of the site.

More details about Rep ID: 11840

Representation ID: 11724

COMMENT Haughley Park Consortium represented by Boyer Planning (Mr. James Bailey)

Summary:

The Councils should support development which seeks to preserve and, in particular, enhance the setting of designated assets, in accordance with National Policy and specifically in respect of Paragraph 126 of the NPPF.
In line with this and in respect of Haughley Park (House) and Haughley Park Barn, we consider that support should be given to future planning applications that seek to enhance the setting of these important Grade I and Grade ll listed buildings.

More details about Rep ID: 11724

Representation ID: 11702

COMMENT Lady Valerie Hart

Summary:

LPAs have already a statutory duty to protect and enhance heritage assets. Evidence suggests that 9 out of 10 people agree that when improving local places it is worth saving their historic features.^ The historic environment has an important role to play in providing an attractive, safe and sustainable place and should be regarded as a vital contributor to improving the quality of place and quality of life. Insufficient recognition is given to this in past local plans. Further, the JLP could pay more attention to the wishes of the local community and also to the views of regional heritage bodies such as Suffolk Preservation Society, The Sudbury Society and Suffolk Garden Trust. In my experience, advice from English Heritage is not given sufficient weight and the in-house heritage advisers at BDC should be consulted more often. A well cared for historic environment is one of the keys to making a locality attractive to people and to encourage the retention of workers and attracting inward investment.
Councillors sitting on the planning committee should be given more training about heritage issues.

More details about Rep ID: 11702

Representation ID: 11460

COMMENT Stour & Orwell Society (Ms Emma Proctor King)

Summary:

These are well protected by national policy. Their settings, however, should be carefully safeguarded by the Councils.

Babergh could also include a policy to take action to secure and safeguard a heritage asset which is at risk, such as the magnificent Grade II* Listed Bentley Hall Barn, which has been allowed to rot for years.

More details about Rep ID: 11460

Representation ID: 11361

OBJECT Sproughton Playing Field (Damian Lavington)

Summary:

* The JLP refers to the 'Heritage Settlement and Landscape Sensitivity Assessment'. This will apparently identify areas where 'development can enhance the landscape'. But it is incomplete and nothing, not even the defining criteria, has been disclosed. This is a ticking rural development time bomb.

More details about Rep ID: 11361

Representation ID: 10939

OBJECT Mrs Carol Marshall

Summary:

* The JLP refers to the 'Heritage Settlement and Landscape Sensitivity Assessment'. This will apparently identify areas where 'development can enhance the landscape'. But it is incomplete and nothing, not even the defining criteria, has been disclosed. It is a ticking rural development time bomb.

More details about Rep ID: 10939

Representation ID: 10825

COMMENT Mendlesham Parish Council (Mrs Sharon Jones )

Summary:

The maintenance of a robust and up to date register of heritage and non designated heritage assets.

More details about Rep ID: 10825

Representation ID: 10738

COMMENT Ms Caroline Powell

Summary:

* The JLP refers to the 'Heritage Settlement and Landscape Sensitivity Assessment'. This will apparently identify areas where 'development can enhance the landscape'. But it is incomplete and nothing, not even the defining criteria, has been disclosed. Comment on any aspect of development in landscape areas is pointless when we don't know what is being proposed.
* Therefore the only acceptable option is the continued use of the SLA and other visual local landscape designations to be robustly applied, which has not been the case during the last LP.

More details about Rep ID: 10738

Representation ID: 10492

OBJECT Mr Joe Lavington

Summary:

* The JLP refers to the 'Heritage Settlement and Landscape Sensitivity Assessment'. This will apparently identify areas where 'development can enhance the landscape'. But it is incomplete and nothing, not even the defining criteria, has been disclosed. This is a ticking rural development time bomb.

More details about Rep ID: 10492

Representation ID: 10439

OBJECT Wendy Lavington

Summary:

* The JLP refers to the 'Heritage Settlement and Landscape Sensitivity Assessment'. This will apparently identify areas where 'development can enhance the landscape'. But it is incomplete and nothing, not even the defining criteria, has been disclosed. This is a ticking rural development time bomb.

More details about Rep ID: 10439

Representation ID: 10081

COMMENT Historic England (Katie Parsons)

Summary:

The conservation and enhancement of the historic environment can bring a range of
multi-faceted benefits which can help achieve spatial planning goals.

A coordinated appreciation of the historic environment which addresses both the heritage assets themselves and their setting will reinforce their integrity and therefore will help ensure that historic places and spaces continue to provide long term public benefits. An integrated approach to policy preparation which recognises the social, economic and environmental dimensions of the historic environment and which seek to conserve this irreplaceable resource maximise the effect heritage assets can have.

More details about Rep ID: 10081

Representation ID: 10080

COMMENT Historic England (Katie Parsons)

Summary:

Brent Eleigh, East Bergholt, Great Waldingfield, Thoringdon Street and Naughton are
areas which benefit from having Conservation Area designations for which
Conservation Area Appraisals are still to be prepared and adopted. It is
recommended that the need to compile these appraisals is outlined within a historic
environment policy in the Plan. The completion of these Conservation Area
Appraisals would also be a useful monitoring indicator.
It is recommended that any forthcoming historic environment policies reference to
how proposals should address technical archaeological matters.

More details about Rep ID: 10080

Representation ID: 10016

OBJECT Charlotte Lavington

Summary:

* The JLP refers to the 'Heritage Settlement and Landscape Sensitivity Assessment'. This will apparently identify areas where 'development can enhance the landscape'. But it is incomplete and nothing, not even the defining criteria, has been disclosed. This is a ticking rural development time bomb.

More details about Rep ID: 10016

Representation ID: 9751

COMMENT Miss R P Baillon

Summary:

The Joint Local Plan can do nothing unless those responsible for it are strict about ensuring that the Plan is adhered to with firm control. Heritage assets need to be preserved and protected. Those responsible should be encouraged to go for Lottery funding and grants to restore buildings where necessary. If developers are making significant amounts of money in nearby areas, they should contribute financially or in kind to the upkeep of the heritage sites within the area. Many heritage sites bring income from tourism. Collaboration with the variety of trusts such as Suffolk Wildlife Trust, the RSPB etc could provide valuable information.

More details about Rep ID: 9751

Representation ID: 9630

COMMENT R Williams, A Williams and Ensors Trustee Co. Ltd represented by Boyer Planning (Mr. James Bailey)

Summary:

Councils should acknowledge in their emerging joint Local Plan that designated assets are required to have greater consideration and protection, especially when compared with non-designated assets. Existing designations have previously been identified for a reason. Unless that reason has changed, then it should be expected that existing designated assets should be afforded greater respect and protection than sites or assets that have not yet been designated.

Councils should include a specific "designated assets" policy which supports development which seeks to preserve and enhance the setting of designated assets, in accordance with National Policy and specifically in respect of NPPF Paragraph 126. With regards to Haughley Park (house) and Haughley Park Barn support should be given to future applications that seek to enhance the setting of these listed buildings.

More details about Rep ID: 9630

Representation ID: 9599

COMMENT Mrs Mel Seager

Summary:

The JLP refers to the 'Heritage Settlement and Landscape Sensitivity Assessment'. This will apparently identify areas where 'development can enhance the landscape'. But it is incomplete and nothing, not even the defining criteria, has been disclosed. It is a ticking rural development time bomb.

More details about Rep ID: 9599

Representation ID: 9565

COMMENT Cllr John Hinton

Summary:

By respecting them and considering the impact they have visually and economically on the District.

More details about Rep ID: 9565

Representation ID: 9461

COMMENT Bacton Parish Council (mrs tina newell)

Summary:

Consult with parishes to identify non-heritage assets in their area that are valued locally.

More details about Rep ID: 9461

Representation ID: 9354

COMMENT Nayland with Wissington Parish Council (Mrs D Hattrell)

Summary:

Nayland with Wissington Parish Council believes that it is the duty of the Planning Authority to support heritage assets by avoiding unnecessary development in designated Conservation Areas.

More details about Rep ID: 9354

Representation ID: 9317

COMMENT Wickham Skeith Parish Council (Tara Goodacre)

Summary:

The Conservation within Wickham Skeith is of great importance and the Parish Council would like this area to be protected and clearly defined.

More details about Rep ID: 9317

Representation ID: 9241

COMMENT The Gooderham Family and ESCO Developments Ltd represented by Cheffins Planning & Development (Mr Jon Jennings)

Summary:

The assessment of each site identified for allocation should have an appropriate and proportionate assessment of their impact on heritage assets. This is very important as there are proposed allocations which surround listed building which will unquestionably have a detrimental impact on their setting.

More details about Rep ID: 9241

Representation ID: 8883

COMMENT Mr Simon Pearce

Summary:

"Preserve and enhance " our designated areas.

More details about Rep ID: 8883

Representation ID: 8832

COMMENT Mr Philip Schofield

Summary:

Retain current protections, but support/seek sympathetic changes that allow them to be comfortably and affordably lived in and maintained

More details about Rep ID: 8832

Representation ID: 8636

COMMENT Woolpit Parish Council (Mrs Peggy Fuller)

Summary:

Councils should continue with option L1 go retain Special Landscape areas, Visually Important Open Spaces and Areas of Visual and Recreational Amenity and any development must maintain
or enhance these qualities

More details about Rep ID: 8636

Representation ID: 8565

COMMENT Mr Peter Powell

Summary:

* By ensuring the planning departments enforce the appropriate policies as they were intended and developed over many decades of experience and local knowledge.
* We don't know how important a heritage asset will be to future generations. Stonehenge lay abandoned for 5000 years! They should be cared for if we can, neglected if we can't but never wilfully removed or destroyed

More details about Rep ID: 8565

Representation ID: 8500

COMMENT Sproughton Parish Council (Mrs Susan Frankis)

Summary:

It is important to acknowledge heritage assets existence and apply policies appropriately in order to either passively protect them or conserve them. Local knowledge should be gathered from communities as part of policy development. A flexible approach to climate change objectives (say, insulation) needs to be adopted to protect assets ( such as Listed Buildings) from inappropriate change in character.

More details about Rep ID: 8500

Representation ID: 8297

COMMENT Botesdale & Rickinghall CAP Group (Mr. William Sargeant)

Summary:

Adopt HA1

More details about Rep ID: 8297

Representation ID: 8041

COMMENT Suffolk Preservation Society (Bethany Philbedge)

Summary:

The Joint Plan must make a positive statement setting out the approach of the management of the historic environment.

More details about Rep ID: 8041

Representation ID: 7684

COMMENT Chilton Parish Council (Mr Dave Crimmin)

Summary:

Evidence suggests that 9 out of 10 people agree that when improving local places it is worth saving their historic features. The historic environment has an important role to play in providing an attractive, safe and sustainable place and should be regarded as a vital contributor to improving the quality of place and quality of life. The JLP could pay more attention to the wishes of the local community and also to the views of regional heritage bodies such as SPS, The Sudbury Society and Suffolk Garden Trust.

More details about Rep ID: 7684

Representation ID: 7615

COMMENT Mrs Annette Brennand

Summary:

Through proper enforcement of relevant policies designed to preserve heritage assets for future generations.

More details about Rep ID: 7615

Representation ID: 7522

COMMENT Dr DAVID Brennand

Summary:

Through proper enforcement of relevant policies designed to preserve heritage assets for future generations.

More details about Rep ID: 7522

Representation ID: 7321

COMMENT Great Waldingfield PC (Mr Cecil Allard)

Summary:

By protecting, developing id appropriate and promoting

More details about Rep ID: 7321

Representation ID: 7230

COMMENT Mr Bernard Rushton

Summary:

The Joint Local Plan should protect, preserve and enhance the setting of all Heritage assets in order to support - and boost - tourism

More details about Rep ID: 7230

Representation ID: 7226

SUPPORT Mrs Cindy Hughes

Summary:

by carrying out a comprehensive review of Conservation Areas and seeking to protect and preserve our county's special and unique heritage.

More details about Rep ID: 7226

Representation ID: 7018

COMMENT Mrs Tania Farrow

Summary:

Adopt option HA1

More details about Rep ID: 7018

Representation ID: 7016

COMMENT Mrs Linda Rushton

Summary:

Heritage assets lead to Tourism and should always be protected.

More details about Rep ID: 7016

Representation ID: 6645

COMMENT Denham Parish Council (Sarah Foote)

Summary:

Denham Parish Council favours the adoption of HA1

More details about Rep ID: 6645

Representation ID: 6573

COMMENT Freston Parish Council (Ms Elizabeth Aldous)

Summary:

N/A

More details about Rep ID: 6573

Representation ID: 6113

COMMENT Mr Carroll Reeve

Summary:

There is a high concentration of heritage assets in the two districts and they need protection with meaningful policies and subsequent enforcement. This will require the co-operation of other agencies, mainly those already consulted under the Duty to Co-operate procedure.
In Lavenham we have an early, in situ gas holder circa 1832 (a SAM). Its condition is deplorable and it has trees growing out of it. The parish council is willing to take on the responsibility for the site.

More details about Rep ID: 6113

Representation ID: 6001

COMMENT Little Waldingfield Parish Council (Mr Andy Sheppard)

Summary:

LWPC believes the Joint Local Plan should encourage alternative uses of heritage assets where appropriate.

More details about Rep ID: 6001

Representation ID: 5926

COMMENT Little Cornard Parish Council (Mr Dave Crimmin)

Summary:

Working with local groups to identify heritage assets and maintain register. Support lottery applications to develop sites for public access.

More details about Rep ID: 5926

Representation ID: 5786

SUPPORT Long Melford Parish Council (Mr Robert Wiliams)

Summary:

Through use of Policy HA1

More details about Rep ID: 5786

Representation ID: 5761

COMMENT Mr Adrian James

Summary:

Leave them alone

More details about Rep ID: 5761

Representation ID: 5634

COMMENT Pinewood Parish Council (Mrs Sandra Peartree)

Summary:

Preserve, protect and maintain.

More details about Rep ID: 5634

Representation ID: 5460

COMMENT Mrs Louise Baldry

Summary:

JLP mentions 'Heritage Settlement and Landscape Sensitivity Assessment'. This will identify areas where 'development can enhance the landscape'. It is incomplete and nothing, not even the defining criteria, has been disclosed. It needs publishing before JLP adopted

More details about Rep ID: 5460

Representation ID: 5197

COMMENT Mr Richard Fletcher

Summary:

To make the most of heritage assets the Council needs to:-

1 - Put in place a rolling programme of review of Conservation Areas and updated Conservation Area Appraisals,
2 - Set-up another programme of compilation of Local Lists of Non-designated Heritage Assets.
3 - Arrange programme of surveying recording listed buildings.

The Council in achieving these programmes ought liaise and involve community groups most of whom will have expert knowledge and skills necessary in undertaking and or assisting in such exercises. Such organisations would be Amenity Groups, Parish/Town Councils, U3 A.

More details about Rep ID: 5197

Representation ID: 5137

COMMENT Stradbroke Parish Council (Odile Wladon)

Summary:

will be addressed in the local neighbourhood plan.

More details about Rep ID: 5137

Representation ID: 5023

COMMENT Brantham Parish Council (Mrs Sarah Keys)

Summary:

By protecting them and preserving them, and looking for alternate uses where appropriate.

More details about Rep ID: 5023

Representation ID: 4964

COMMENT Nedging with Naughton Parish Council (Miss LYNN ALLUM)

Summary:

?

More details about Rep ID: 4964

Representation ID: 4797

COMMENT Woolverstone Parish Council (Mr Simon Pearce)

Summary:

By protecting designated areas.

More details about Rep ID: 4797

Representation ID: 4721

COMMENT Lavenham Parish Council (Carroll Reeve)

Summary:

There is a high concentration of heritage assets in the two districts and they need protection with meaningful policies and subsequent enforcement. This will require the co-operation of other agencies, mainly those already consulted under the Duty to Co-operate procedure.
In Lavenham we have an early, in situ gas holder circa 1832. Its condition is deplorable and it has trees growing out of it. The parish council is willing to take on the responsibility for the site.

More details about Rep ID: 4721

Representation ID: 4663

COMMENT Holton St Mary Parish Council (Ms Dorothy Steeds )

Summary:

The plan must adhere strictly to existing policies to protect the setting and environment of heritage assets as well as the assets themselves.

More details about Rep ID: 4663

Representation ID: 4511

COMMENT Kersey Parish Council (Mrs Sarah Partridge)

Summary:

The Parish Council supports HA1. Protection of Heritage Assets should be integral to any planning proposals.

More details about Rep ID: 4511

Representation ID: 4301

COMMENT Mrs Sheila Hurdwell

Summary:

Place greater importance on setting when considering planning applications that may affect traditional rural environment

More details about Rep ID: 4301

Representation ID: 3707

COMMENT Mr Neil Lister

Summary:

JLP mentions 'Heritage Settlement and Landscape Sensitivity Assessment'. This will identify areas where 'development can enhance the landscape'. It is incomplete and nothing, not even the defining criteria, has been disclosed. It needs publishing before JLP adopted.

More details about Rep ID: 3707

Representation ID: 3522

COMMENT Fressingfield Parish Council (Mr Alexander Day)

Summary:

The Parish Council supports the 'option' HA1 which refers to the compilation of a local list of heritage assets by the local community perhaps as part of a Neighbourhood Development Plan drawing on the local knowledge. Some communities have a very high proportion of listed buildings and should therefore expect a higher level of protection. Efforts should also be made within the local list to identify assets considered at risk and greater efforts made to restore these, if necessary for community use.

More details about Rep ID: 3522

Representation ID: 3492

COMMENT Mr John Kitson

Summary:

By ensuring the Planning Departments have the necessary policies together with the authority to apply and enforce them (in spirit as well as word).

More details about Rep ID: 3492

Representation ID: 3013

COMMENT Wortham & Burgate Parish Council (mrs Netty Verkroost)

Summary:

To take note of our Village Design Statement

More details about Rep ID: 3013

Representation ID: 2957

COMMENT Diss & District Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group (Ms Deborah Sarson)

Summary:

By re-appraising and updating Conservation Areas and identifying additional assets for Listing in addition to preparing Local lists; placing greater importance on setting when considering planning applications that may affect heritage assets, as per the NPPF and English Heritage guidance; working pro-actively with service providers to remove intrusive elements such as telephone and electricity poles from the historic and traditional streetscapes and settings and to ensure that services are sited underground in existing places as well as new developments.
By adopting option HA1 provided it is supplemented by appropriate strong and unequivocal policies to ensure heritage assets remain adequately protected.

More details about Rep ID: 2957

Representation ID: 2664

COMMENT Cockfield Parish Council (Mr Doug Reed)

Summary:

Cockfield Parish Council believes that this has no direct impact upon or relevance to the village and so offers no response.

More details about Rep ID: 2664

Representation ID: 2620

COMMENT Hadleigh Society (Margaret Woods)

Summary:

The Joint Local Plan needs three elements in making the most of its heritage assets whether designated or non designated. These are;-

1) presumption of retention of, and safeguarding Heritage assets from demolition, damaging alterations and or additions.
2) policies safeguarding all assets within Conservation Areas from development that does not conserve or enhance those assets, and
3) set up a rolling programme of compiling updated Conservation Area Appraisals, Local Lists of Non Designated Heritage Assets, with positive involvement invited from local communities, local history societies and Town Councils

More details about Rep ID: 2620

Representation ID: 2303

COMMENT Chelmondiston PC (Mrs Rosie Kirkup)

Summary:

By protecting and enhancing these assets so that they do not suffer from neglect or by the impinging of inappropriate development.

More details about Rep ID: 2303

Representation ID: 2200

COMMENT Mr. A. Breen

Summary:

The value of heritage assets are limited if they are just private spaces, not open to the public or open on a very limited number of occasions. Important buildings are of limited value if they cannot be seen because they are hidden behind a park wall, high fence or hedge.

More details about Rep ID: 2200

Representation ID: 1953

COMMENT Palgrave Parish Council (Sarah Foote)

Summary:

By adopting option HA1 provided that it is supplemented by appropriate strong and unequivocal policies to ensure heritage assets remain adequately protected.

More details about Rep ID: 1953

Representation ID: 1854

COMMENT Debenham Parish Council (Mr Richard Blackwell)

Summary:

See response to Q51.

More details about Rep ID: 1854

Representation ID: 1779

COMMENT Mr Richard Blackwell

Summary:

See response to Q51.

More details about Rep ID: 1779

Representation ID: 1593

COMMENT Mr Alf Hannan

Summary:

Maintain and repair buildings; enhance natural habitats and not encroach on historic woodland and sites of archaeological importance

More details about Rep ID: 1593

Representation ID: 1277

COMMENT Raydon Parish Council (Mrs Jane Cryer)

Summary:

Encourage / invite all Town and Parish Councils to review their area and to put forward recommendations for heritage assets

More details about Rep ID: 1277

Representation ID: 1040

COMMENT Mr Roy Barker

Summary:

protect them and make them assessable to the public but limited

More details about Rep ID: 1040

Representation ID: 826

COMMENT Supporters Against Fressingfield Expansion (SAFE) (Dr John Castro)

Summary:

By protecting, not just the listed assets, but also their setting which is in line with the old National Policy Guideline PG 22.

More details about Rep ID: 826

Representation ID: 676

SUPPORT Redgrave Parish Council (Mr John Giddings)

Summary:

RPC consIders that a formal tourism policy with expertise and possibly assistance available for tourist attractions would help protect heritage assets.

More details about Rep ID: 676

Representation ID: 315

COMMENT Mr Simon Barrett

Summary:

Have a pragmatic approach to renovation, bring buildings back to life, preserved in aspect may give Heritage officers a warm feeling, but un-realistic.

More details about Rep ID: 315

Representation ID: 230

COMMENT Mr D C Warren

Summary:

Recognise that the local architecture and landscape is why most people chose to live in sSuffolk

More details about Rep ID: 230

Representation ID: 131

COMMENT Mrs Sara Knight

Summary:

By recognising the needs that will help protect them for the future rather than simply preserving the status quo.

More details about Rep ID: 131

Having trouble using the system? Visit our help page or contact us directly.

Powered by OpusConsult