Home > Planning > Planning Policy

Please note: You only need to register / login if you wish to make representations.

You can view the full details of a representation by clicking either on the Representation ID in the top right of the summary box or on the More Details... link at the bottom.

Representations on BMSDC Joint Local Plan Consultation Document (Interactive) - SS1026 - Poplar Lane, Sproughton

Representation ID: 13260

COMMENT Sproughton Parish Council (Mrs Susan Frankis)

Summary:

Site is partially appropriate subject to the development of an appropriate scheme.
With respect to the current Wolsey Grange application, no formal decision has yet been published by the Planning Committee. It is our view, however, that the scheme as set out in the application is not appropriate. What would be more appropriate is development of some housing along the London Road in the South East corner of the site as opposed to the originally proposed employment

More details about Rep ID: 13260

Representation ID: 13066

OBJECT Pinewood Parish Council (Mrs Sandra Peartree)

Summary:

Pinewood map is incorrect

Chantry Vale : SS0191 & SS1024 - Too big a development for infrastructure. Object to be allocated for development due to detrimental effect of local landscape and biodiversity.

More details about Rep ID: 13066

Representation ID: 13064

OBJECT Pinewood Parish Council (Mrs Sandra Peartree)

Summary:

Pinewood map is incorrect

Wolsey Grange : SS0299 & SS1026 - Concerns with infrastructure

More details about Rep ID: 13064

Representation ID: 13033

COMMENT Ipswich Borough Council (

Summary:

The site would need to be properly masterplanned with sites SS0191, SS0299 and SS1024.

More details about Rep ID: 13033

Representation ID: 13020

SUPPORT Dr Jonathan Tuppen

Summary:

Site is partially appropriate subject to the development of an appropriate scheme

More details about Rep ID: 13020

Representation ID: 12785

COMMENT Mr Gary Clark

Summary:

Site is appropriate subject to the development of an appropriate scheme.

More details about Rep ID: 12785

Representation ID: 12728

COMMENT Mr Bryan Fawcett

Summary:

Site is appropriate subject to the development of an appropriate scheme.
With respect to the current Wolsey Grange application, no formal decision has yet been published by the Planning Committee. It is my view, however, that the scheme as set out in the application is not appropriate and I support any challenge Sproughton Parish Council may make to any decision approving that application

More details about Rep ID: 12728

Representation ID: 12640

COMMENT Mr Alastair Powell

Summary:

Site is appropriate subject to the development of an appropriate scheme.
With respect to the current Wolsey Grange application, no formal decision has yet been published by the Planning Committee. It is our view, however, that the scheme as set out in the application is not appropriate and we support any challenge Sproughton Parish Council may make to any decision approving that application.

More details about Rep ID: 12640

Representation ID: 11907

COMMENT Mrs Julie Clark

Summary:

Site is appropriate subject to the development of an appropriate scheme.

More details about Rep ID: 11907

Representation ID: 11868

SUPPORT Mr & Mrs Heather & Michael Earey

Summary:

SS1026
Site is appropriate subject to the development of an appropriate scheme.
With respect to the current Wolsey Grange application, no formal decision has yet been published by the Planning Committee. It is our view, however, that the scheme as set out in the application is not appropriate and we support any challenge Sproughton Parish Council may make to any decision approving that application.

More details about Rep ID: 11868

Representation ID: 11581

COMMENT Annette Powell

Summary:

Site is appropriate subject to the development of an appropriate scheme.
With respect to the current Wolsey Grange application, no formal decision has yet been published by the Planning Committee. It is our view, however, that the scheme as set out in the application is not appropriate and we support any challenge Sproughton Parish Council may make to any decision approving that application.

More details about Rep ID: 11581

Representation ID: 11453

COMMENT Greenways Countryside Project Partnership (Mr. James Baker)

Summary:

any development of this area should include substantial new semi-natural open space to provide recreational opportunities and strengthen the ecological network (potentially located alongside the A14 corridor), and Ipswich 'green rim'.

More details about Rep ID: 11453

Representation ID: 11399

OBJECT Sproughton Playing Field (Damian Lavington)

Summary:

With respect to the current Wolsey Grange application, no formal decision has yet been published by the Planning Committee. It is my view, however, that the scheme as set out in the application is not appropriate and I support any challenge Sproughton Parish Council may make to any decision approving that application.

More details about Rep ID: 11399

Representation ID: 11144

COMMENT Peter Warren

Summary:

This site is allocated for employment land, however, subject to an appropriate scheme would be considered suitable. Complicated by existing residential use and listed building. Better located to minimise infrastructure cost. Landscape and biodiversity issue are of primary importance. The scheme as set out in the existing application is not considered appropriate and I would support any challenge that Sproughton Parish Council may make.

More details about Rep ID: 11144

Representation ID: 10979

COMMENT Mrs Carol Marshall

Summary:

Site is appropriate subject to the development of an appropriate scheme.
With respect to the current Wolsey Grange application, no formal decision has yet been published by the Planning Committee. It is our view, however, that the scheme as set out in the application is not appropriate and we support any challenge Sproughton Parish Council may make to any decision approving that application.

More details about Rep ID: 10979

Representation ID: 10795

SUPPORT Ms Caroline Powell

Summary:

Site is appropriate subject to the development of an appropriate scheme.
With respect to the current Wolsey Grange application, no formal decision has yet been published by the Planning Committee. It is our view, however, that the scheme as set out in the application is not appropriate and we support any challenge Sproughton Parish Council may make to any decision approving that application.

More details about Rep ID: 10795

Representation ID: 10714

OBJECT Mrs LP Wheatley

Summary:

Development would start to merge Sproughton with Ipswich. If there is a genuine need for housing in Sproughton and Babergh then the houses that may be needed should be proportionate to the size of the present communities.

More details about Rep ID: 10714

Representation ID: 10469

COMMENT Mr Joe Lavington

Summary:

With respect to the current Wolsey Grange application, no formal decision has yet been published by the Planning Committee. It is my view, however, that the scheme as set out in the application is not appropriate and I support any challenge Sproughton Parish Council may make to any decision approving that application.

More details about Rep ID: 10469

Representation ID: 10161

COMMENT Historic England (Katie Parsons)

Summary:

To the south within the boundaries of sites SS0299 and SS1026* evidence
of a medieval settlement with finds from 12th, 13th and 14th centuries have been
recorded. The presence if these varied finds indicate that the sites may have further
archaeological potential.

Development of these sites would impact upon these heritage assets. Robust
evidence to support their inclusion should be provided and considered as part of the
allocation process along with any potential mitigation measures.

More details about Rep ID: 10161

Representation ID: 10043

OBJECT Charlotte Lavington

Summary:

With respect to the current Wolsey Grange application, no formal decision has yet been published by the Planning Committee. It is my view, however, that the scheme as set out in the application is not appropriate and I support any challenge Sproughton Parish Council may make to any decision approving that application.

More details about Rep ID: 10043

Representation ID: 9682

COMMENT Mr Chris Marshall

Summary:

Site is appropriate subject to the development of an appropriate scheme.
With respect to the current Wolsey Grange application, no formal decision has yet been published by the Planning Committee. It is our view, however, that the scheme as set out in the application is not appropriate and we support any challenge Sproughton Parish Council may make to any decision approving that application.

More details about Rep ID: 9682

Representation ID: 9618

SUPPORT Mrs Annette Brennand

Summary:

Site is appropriate subject to the development of an appropriate scheme.
With respect to the current Wolsey Grange application, no formal decision has
yet been published by the Planning Committee. It is our view, however, that the
scheme as set out in the application is not appropriate and we support any
challenge Sproughton Parish Council may make to any decision approving that
application.

More details about Rep ID: 9618

Representation ID: 8939

SUPPORT Mrs Hannah Lord-Vince

Summary:

Site is appropriate subject to the development of an appropriate scheme.

More details about Rep ID: 8939

Representation ID: 7124

SUPPORT Mrs Rhona Jermyn

Summary:

SS1026
Site is appropriate subject to the development of an appropriate scheme.
With respect to the current Wolsey Grange application, no formal decision has yet been published by the Planning Committee. It is our view, however, that the scheme as set out in the application is not appropriate and we support any challenge Sproughton Parish Council may make to any decision approving that application.

More details about Rep ID: 7124

Representation ID: 6246

OBJECT Neil Fuller

Summary:

Site is appropriate subject to the development of an appropriate scheme.
With respect to the current Wolsey Grange application, no formal decision has yet been published by the Planning Committee. It is our view, however, that the scheme as set out in the application is not appropriate and we support any challenge Sproughton Parish Council may make to any decision approving that application.

More details about Rep ID: 6246

Representation ID: 4060

SUPPORT Mr Vic Durrant

Summary:

I consider the site is appropriate for development, subject to the development of an appropriate scheme. With respect to the current Wolsey Grange application, no formal decision has yet been published by the Planning Committee. It is my view, however, that the scheme as set out in the application is not appropriate and would support any challenge Sproughton Parish Council may make to any decision approving that application.

More details about Rep ID: 4060

Representation ID: 3881

SUPPORT Mrs June Durrant

Summary:

I consider the site is appropriate for development, subject to the development of an appropriate scheme.
With respect to the current Wolsey Grange application, no formal decision has yet been published by the Planning Committee. It is my view, however, that the scheme as set out in the application is not appropriate and would support any challenge Sproughton Parish Council may make to any decision approving that application.

More details about Rep ID: 3881

Having trouble using the system? Visit our help page or contact us directly.

Powered by OpusConsult