Home > Planning > Planning Policy

PLEASE NOTE: You only need to register / login if you wish to make representations.

You can view the full details of a representation by clicking either on the Representation ID in the top right of the summary box or on the More Details... link at the bottom.

Representations on BMSDC Joint Local Plan Consultation Document (Interactive) - Option NROS1

Representation ID: 11981

SUPPORT Pigeon Investmenrt Management (Mr. Andrew Fillmore) represented by Beacon Planning Ltd (Ms Sophie Pain)

Summary:

Development proposals should be considered on a site by site basis. Accordingly, we support Option NROS1 which leaves it to the NPPF to provide the policy framework.

More details about Rep ID: 11981

Representation ID: 11913

SUPPORT Amber REI represented by Pegasus Group (Mr David Onions)

Summary:

With regard to on site open space related to non-residential uses this should be left to the NPPF to provide the policy framework (Option NROS1). Provision of on site open space when associated with items such as new employment development often results in under-utilised land, reduction in densities and a need for more land to be allocated elsewhere. In particular a flexible approach is needed dependent on site circumstances and where open spaces can fulfil a range of functions including attenuation areas, recreation space, or amenity areas.

More details about Rep ID: 11913

Representation ID: 8814

COMMENT Mr Peter Powell

Summary:

Both policies have their merit. This policy does not limit itself to size and I think it is numbers that matter not size. There should be proportionate outdoor space suitable for employees to relax and mix that goes beyond say a car park.

More details about Rep ID: 8814

Representation ID: 5490

COMMENT Mrs Louise Baldry

Summary:

Do not water down existing open spaces by allowing development.

More details about Rep ID: 5490

Representation ID: 3824

COMMENT Mr Richard Howard

Summary:

Do not water down existing open spaces by allowing development.

More details about Rep ID: 3824

Representation ID: 2204

OBJECT Mr. A. Breen

Summary:

The high density of housing development required by the National Planning Policy Framework negates against the provision of open space, this together with the cost of land is leading to crowded developments unsuitable for Suffolk and out of character with the area. A more regional approach is necessary.

More details about Rep ID: 2204

Representation ID: 328

SUPPORT Mr Simon Barrett

Summary:

I approve

More details about Rep ID: 328

Having trouble using the system? Visit our help page or contact us directly.

Powered by OpusConsult