Home > Planning > Planning Policy

PLEASE NOTE: You only need to register / login if you wish to make representations.

If you haven't got an account you can register now.
If you have forgotten your password you can request a new password.

You can view the full details of a representation by clicking either on the Representation ID in the top right of the summary box or on the More Details... link at the bottom.

Representations on BMSDC Joint Local Plan Consultation Document (Interactive) - Q10

Representation ID: 13156

COMMENT Taylor Wimpey represented by Boyer Planning (Mr. James Bailey)

Summary:

It is considered that, if allocated sites are not coming forward at the rate to which they are anticipated in accordance with the adopted housing trajectory, this should also trigger the delivery of the reserved sites for consideration.

We would suggest that, if the Council are unable to demonstrate a 5 year housing land supply, this should also set a trigger for reserve sites to come forward. This would ensure that the Council are meeting their housing need, whilst also ensuring that housing is coming forward in the most sustainable locations, as this would have been a factor in determining the location of the reserve sites.

More details about Rep ID: 13156

Representation ID: 13145

COMMENT Woolverstone Parish Council (Mr Simon Pearce)

Summary:

Identify the needs within a village. Increased employment opportunities. Availability of existing or planned infrastructure. Not because of a failure in another part of the district.

More details about Rep ID: 13145

Representation ID: 12852

COMMENT Tidal Hill Limited represented by Armstrong Rigg Planning (Mr Geoff Armstrong)

Summary:

The Housing Delivery Test would require the preparation of a 'Delivery Action Plan' for Local Authorities whose recent delivery falls between 85% and 95% of their annual required. It sets out how they will essentially make up for their undersupply over the course of the next year.

Reserve sites should be brought forward in the following instances:
* Immediately upon the lapse of the Council's five-year housing land supply;
* Immediately, where annual delivery has fallen below 85%; or
* Where annual delivery falls below 95% and selected sites are Identified for early delivery in the required 'Delivery Action Plan'.

More details about Rep ID: 12852

Representation ID: 12539

COMMENT Llanover Estates represented by LRM Planning Ltd (michael rees)

Summary:

Para 49 of the NPPF is clear that "Relevant policies for the supply of housing should not be considered up-to-date if the local planning authority cannot demonstrate a five-year supply of deliverable housing sites".
Plainly where the Authority can not identify a five year supply of land for housing, it should seek to take appropriate measures to rectify the situation. In the first instance however the priority should be to ensure a robust supply of sites through the plan process in line with the NPPF requirement to significantly boost supply. Indeed this is in the spirit of it being positively prepared and not planning for failure.

More details about Rep ID: 12539

Representation ID: 12464

COMMENT Taylor Wimpey represented by Boyer Planning (Ms Libby Hindle)

Summary:

If allocated sites are not coming forward at the rate to which they are anticipated in accordance with the adopted housing trajectory, this should trigger the delivery of the reserved sites for consideration.

We would suggest that, if the Council are unable to demonstrate a 5 year housing land supply, this should also set a trigger for reserve sites to come forward. This would ensure that the Council are meeting their housing need, whilst also ensuring that housing is coming forward in the most sustainable locations, as this would have been a factor in determining the location of the reserve sites. Mechanisms to avoid a shortfall in housing development and delivery are vital to consider at this stage of an emerging Local Plan.

More details about Rep ID: 12464

Representation ID: 12309

COMMENT Taylor Wimpey represented by Boyer Planning (Mr. James Bailey)

Summary:

Considered that, if allocated sites are not coming forward at the rate to which they are anticipated in accordance with the adopted housing trajectory, this should trigger the delivery of the reserved sites for consideration. We would suggest that, if the Council are unable to demonstrate a 5 year housing land supply, this should also set a trigger for reserve sites to come forward. This would ensure that the Council are meeting their housing need, whilst also ensuring that housing is coming forward in the most sustainable locations, as this would have been a factor in determining the location of the reserve sites. Mechanisms to avoid a shortfall in housing development and delivery are vital to consider at this stage of the emerging Local Plan.

More details about Rep ID: 12309

Representation ID: 12254

COMMENT R G Williams Ltd represented by Gardner Planning (Mr Geoff Gardner)

Summary:

There need be no 'reserve' sites if overall provision has a built-in 20% contingency.

More details about Rep ID: 12254

Representation ID: 12156

COMMENT LRM Planning Ltd (michael rees)

Summary:

See attachment for full representation.
where the Authority can not identify a five year supply of land for housing, it should seek to take appropriate measures to rectify the situation. In the first instance however the priority should be to ensure a robust supply of sites through the plan process in line with the NPPF requirement to significantly boost supp

More details about Rep ID: 12156

Representation ID: 12100

COMMENT Gladman (Mr Richard Crosthwaite)

Summary:

Essential for the Local Plan to include effective monitoring triggers to ensure that it is responsive to potential changes in circumstance. Such an approach will assist the local authorities in demonstrating a positive and effective commitment to maintaining a rolling five year supply of deliverable housing sites.

More details about Rep ID: 12100

Representation ID: 12030

COMMENT Bloor Homes Eastern (Mr Gary Duncan) represented by JB Planning Associates (Mr Nicholas Ward)

Summary:

It will be vital that the Councils work with site promoters and landowners to ensure
that suitable sustainable sites that can be quickly brought forward for development
are allocated. Small and medium sized sites being particularly important in terms of
ensuring housing delivery is boosted at the beginning of the Plan period, when larger
and strategic sized sites are still waiting to come on stream.

More details about Rep ID: 12030

Representation ID: 12014

COMMENT Endurance Estates represented by Pegasus Group (Jamie Roberts)

Summary:

We would suggest that triggers are set slightly above the minimum threshold for a five year supply or for the housing delivery test. For example, it may be that reserve sites can be released at the point where a 5.5-year supply can be demonstrated. Having a trigger at this point would allow sites to come forward to 'top-up' the supply without dropping below the five-year target.

More details about Rep ID: 12014

Representation ID: 11997

COMMENT Endurance Estates represented by Pegasus Group (Jamie Roberts)

Summary:

We would suggest that triggers are set slightly above the minimum threshold for a five year supply or for the housing delivery test. For example, it may be that reserve sites can be released at the point where a 5.5-year supply can be demonstrated. Having a trigger at this point would allow sites to come forward to 'top-up' the supply without dropping below the five-year target.

More details about Rep ID: 11997

Representation ID: 11406

OBJECT Stour & Orwell Society (Ms Emma Proctor King)

Summary:

We do not support reserve sites.

More details about Rep ID: 11406

Representation ID: 11218

COMMENT Bildeston Parish Council (Mr David Blackburn)

Summary:

Triggers for reserve sites should be focussed on specific local need, including local employment, rather than on a generalised calculation of housing numbers across the district.

More details about Rep ID: 11218

Representation ID: 11168

COMMENT Old Newton Parish Council (Mrs Karen Price)

Summary:

Loss of the 5 year supply.

More details about Rep ID: 11168

Representation ID: 10904

COMMENT Lady Anne Windsor Charity (Deborah Langstaff)

Summary:

The Joint Local Plan should include an annual review of housing delivery.

More details about Rep ID: 10904

Representation ID: 10763

COMMENT Mendlesham Parish Council (Mrs Sharon Jones )

Summary:

Prefer to see a proper review made at the time it is deemed necessary to increase supply (or meet failures to achieve local targets).
If reserve sites were used how would the decision to use them be reached? Would there be local consultation?

More details about Rep ID: 10763

Representation ID: 10677

COMMENT Thorcross Builders Limited (A. Goodwin) represented by Springfields Planning and Development Limited (Mr Chris Loon)

Summary:

Q 10 asks what factors or priorities should be set as triggers for reserve sites to come forward. The key trigger should be when the LPA's 5 Year Housing Land Supply (HLS) cannot be demonstrated. In this scenario, planning applications for housing which are validly submitted within 9 months of the 5 Year HLS last being shown as not being available should be treated favourably under the councils' reserve sites policy

More details about Rep ID: 10677

Representation ID: 10565

COMMENT Hopkins Homes Ltd represented by Armstrong Rigg Planning (Mr Geoff Armstrong)

Summary:

A 20% contingency should be included in the Plan allocations with the lapse in the Council's five-year supply or recent undersupply representing the natural triggers for the release of reserve sites.

More details about Rep ID: 10565

Representation ID: 10244

COMMENT Taylor Wimpey represented by Boyer Planning (Kate Kerrigan)

Summary:

If allocated sites are not coming forward ........ in accordance with the adopted housing trajectory, this should trigger the delivery of the reserved sites for consideration. and if the Council are unable to demonstrate a 5 year housing land supply, this should also set a trigger for reserve sites to come forward. To ensure the Council are meeting their housing need, whilst also ensuring that housing is coming forward in the most sustainable locations, Mechanisms to avoid a shortfall in housing development and delivery are vital to consider at this stage of the emerging Local Plan.

More details about Rep ID: 10244

Representation ID: 9698

COMMENT Miss R P Baillon

Summary:

Brownfield sites should be explored for reserve sites and possibly run-down industrial sites and disused airfields. In some cases, perhaps airfields with limited current use could be amalgamated and the land used for building a village or town from scratch. This would allow the amenities and infrastructure to be incorporated at the start of the development.

Northern towns need radical redevelopment. Perhaps councils from the north and south need to co-operate and explore ways of making positive conditions out of population distribution. Collaboration should be made with genuine research institutions rather than consultancy firms.

More details about Rep ID: 9698

Representation ID: 9518

OBJECT Cllr John Hinton

Summary:

Reserve sites should only come forward if all other sites have been started and infrastructure improvements have been agreed, financed and implemented. A low carbon economy does not or should not encourage commuting.

We also need a census, every property surveyed, type assessment of housing, current and future within the District - not encouraging migration, currently over 60%, but which reflects the views and requirements both now and in the future of the current population who are too often ignored and have policies imposed upon them after a small snap shot of apparent NEED has been obtained.

More details about Rep ID: 9518

Representation ID: 9426

COMMENT Bacton Parish Council (mrs tina newell)

Summary:

Loss of 5 year land supply, with priority for unmet demand for affordable homes for first time buyers, local residents, and 'empty nesters' wishing to downsize.

More details about Rep ID: 9426

Representation ID: 9340

COMMENT Mrs Mel Seager

Summary:

Q10: Trigger factors

Replacement, not addition! Reserve sites should be considered when something prevents an originally-identified site from being developed within the intended time scale. If there is a need to bring reserve site(s) forward, these should be instead of, not as well as, the originally-intended site(s).

More details about Rep ID: 9340

Representation ID: 9324

COMMENT J W Baldwin Farms represented by Pegasus Group (Mr Robert Barber)

Summary:

My client would welcome further clarification on trigger points and monitoring arrangements moving forward.

More details about Rep ID: 9324

Representation ID: 9234

COMMENT The Gooderham Family and ESCO Developments Ltd represented by Cheffins Planning & Development (Mr Jon Jennings)

Summary:

The Council needs to undertake a detailed and robust analysis of housing delivery and use this to rapidly trigger the release of reserve sites. This needs to be underpinned by realistic assessments of housing delivery, rather than applying those which purports to show that the Council will soon be able to demonstrate a deliverable five-year housing land supply. In addition, in allocating reserve sites the Council will need to apply appropriate measures to ensure that they are available and deliverable.

More details about Rep ID: 9234

Representation ID: 9187

OBJECT Mr Ken Seager

Summary:

Replacement, not addition! Reserve sites should be considered when something prevents an originally-identified site from being developed within the intended time scale. If there is a need to bring reserve site(s) forward, these should be instead of, not as well as, the originally-intended site(s).

More details about Rep ID: 9187

Representation ID: 9145

COMMENT Mr Bay Knowles represented by Keymer Cavendish Limited (Mr Edward Keymer)

Summary:

All sites should be allowed to come forward to assist urgent delivery and to address historic shortfall.

More details about Rep ID: 9145

Representation ID: 8997

COMMENT Onehouse Parish Council (Mrs Peggy Fuller)

Summary:

Reserve sites should only come forward if the development figures across the entire district look to be falling below OAN level and the number of planning applications granted are below this level.

More details about Rep ID: 8997

Representation ID: 8962

COMMENT Andrew Searle

Summary:

Economic necessity- need more people in certain locale

More details about Rep ID: 8962

Representation ID: 8743

COMMENT Mr Philip Schofield

Summary:

Their proximity to highly likely new sources of employment

More details about Rep ID: 8743

Representation ID: 8528

COMMENT Mr David Pettitt represented by Keymer Cavendish Limited (Philippa Hull)

Summary:

All sites should be allowed to come forward to assist urgent delivery and to address historic shortfall.

More details about Rep ID: 8528

Representation ID: 8259

COMMENT Acton Parish Council (Mr Paul MacLachlan)

Summary:

Delivery - given that the purpose of releasing a contingency site is to
increase the available land supply it follows that the housing numbers associated with a contingency site must be deliverable within the period required;
Capacity: the contingency site(s) released should be capable of delivering sufficient housing to cover the shortfall identified;
Location: Subject to delivery and capacity, if a shortfall is identified in a specific area then priority should be given to releasing one or more contingency sites in the shortfall area.

More details about Rep ID: 8259

Representation ID: 8009

COMMENT Botesdale & Rickinghall CAP Group (Mr. William Sargeant)

Summary:

The lack of a demonstrable 5-year housing land supply has resulted in almost uncontrolled development proposals coming forward recently. The reserve or partially developed approved sites should be triggered to maintain an adequate margin to the 5-year housing land supply to ensure that the current situation is avoided in future.

More details about Rep ID: 8009

Representation ID: 7953

COMMENT Mrs Sarah Knibbs

Summary:

Sequential policy is needed to ensure allocated sites are developed before reserve sites

More details about Rep ID: 7953

Representation ID: 7595

COMMENT Mrs Annette Brennand

Summary:

Key triggers for reserve sites should be (i) failure of an allocated site to be developed, and (ii) significant miscalculation of the OAN (underassessment).

More details about Rep ID: 7595

Representation ID: 7339

COMMENT Dr DAVID Brennand

Summary:

Key triggers for reserve sites should be (i) failure of an allocated site to be developed, and (ii) significant miscalculation of the OAN (underassessment).

More details about Rep ID: 7339

Representation ID: 7338

OBJECT Mrs Gillian West

Summary:

I object to the principle of 'reserve sites" therefore could not approve or support any potential 'triggers'. I think this is a lax and harmful proposal and it should be heartily discouraged. It takes power away from the planning department to properly scrutinise sites if a blanket, advanced approval in principal exists and disenfranchises local inhabitants who may be adversely affected by such measures.

More details about Rep ID: 7338

Representation ID: 7191

OBJECT Ms Helen Davies

Summary:

Reserve sites should be considered when something prevents an originally-identified site from being developed within the intended time scale. If there is a need to bring reserve site(s) forward, these should be instead of, not as well as, the originally-intended site(s).

More details about Rep ID: 7191

Representation ID: 7159

OBJECT Ms Sharon Maxwell

Summary:

There should be replacement rather than the addition of sites.

More details about Rep ID: 7159

Representation ID: 7027

COMMENT Great Waldingfield PC (Mr Cecil Allard)

Summary:

reserve sites only when no other option available.

More details about Rep ID: 7027

Representation ID: 6911

COMMENT Mx Miles Row

Summary:

Significant building having been started on all non reserve sites

More details about Rep ID: 6911

Representation ID: 6877

COMMENT Mrs Linda Rushton

Summary:

Completion of a bypass could act as a trigger for development.

More details about Rep ID: 6877

Representation ID: 6870

COMMENT Mr Peter Powell

Summary:

Reserve sites should only be considered when something prevents adopted site from being developed. These should therefore be instead of, not as well as, the originally-intended site(s).
* Reserve sites should be considered when something prevents an originally-identified site from being developed so that it is dropped from the JLP.

More details about Rep ID: 6870

Representation ID: 6342

COMMENT MSDC Green Group (Cllr John Matthissen)

Summary:

Land supply levels should act as triggers for reserve sites provided they are regularly reported
Policies and powers are needed to ensure that reserve sites come forward if needed if they are in private ownership.
Sequential policy is needed to ensure allocated sites are developed before reserve sites

More details about Rep ID: 6342

Representation ID: 6317

OBJECT Barham Parish Council (Mrs Joanne Culley)

Summary:

Sites should be developed within timeframes that meet local needs. It would not be appropriate to bring forward reserve areas because existing sites are not progressing.

More details about Rep ID: 6317

Representation ID: 6279

COMMENT Freston Parish Council (Ms Elizabeth Aldous)

Summary:

N/A

More details about Rep ID: 6279

Representation ID: 6191

COMMENT Mr Simon Williams

Summary:

If the identified sites are not providing sufficient development to meet the targets and the planning authority is in danger losing the ability to be effective (as is currently the case).

More details about Rep ID: 6191

Representation ID: 6163

COMMENT Sproughton Parish Council (Mrs Susan Frankis)

Summary:

If sites that have got planning permission but are not being developed then there is an obvious trigger for bringing in a site to replace it that will be developed.

More details about Rep ID: 6163

Representation ID: 6052

OBJECT Endurance Estates represented by Savills (Mr Paul Rowland)

Summary:

We do not support the proposed approach of reserve sites. The key objective should be to increase delivery and this will not be served by having a list of sites to be released if delivery on other sites is slow. To give maximum flexibility and certainty for investors and builders all suitable sites should be allocated from the start of the plan period and allow the market to determine capacity to deliver.

More details about Rep ID: 6052

Representation ID: 5837

COMMENT Little Cornard Parish Council (Mr Dave Crimmin)

Summary:

Only exceptional circumstances that could not be foreseen.

More details about Rep ID: 5837

Representation ID: 5831

COMMENT Little Waldingfield Parish Council (Mr Andy Sheppard)

Summary:

A reassessment of the OAN, or where a site previously identified as a primary site becomes unsuitable or unavailable (for whatever reason).

More details about Rep ID: 5831

Representation ID: 5830

OBJECT Mrs Nicky Willshere

Summary:

Reserve sites should only come forward if the development figures across the entire district look to be falling below OAN level and the number of planning applications granted are below this level.

More details about Rep ID: 5830

Representation ID: 5782

COMMENT KBB (Keep Bildeston Beautiful) (John Beales)

Summary:

Housing Needs Surveys and increasing local employment indicators.

More details about Rep ID: 5782

Representation ID: 5766

SUPPORT Long Melford Parish Council (Mr Robert Wiliams)

Summary:

When, say, 80% of the capacity of the settlement concerned has been committed, and there are known impediments to the release of the remaining land.

More details about Rep ID: 5766

Representation ID: 5553

COMMENT ms sally sparrow

Summary:

Replacement not additions.
If reserved sites are brought forward an original site that has not been developed should be removed.

More details about Rep ID: 5553

Representation ID: 5447

COMMENT Denham Parish Council (Sarah Foote)

Summary:

Denham Parish Council believes reserve sites should only be considered where there is failure to deliver on existing sites and after assessment of infrastructure needs.

More details about Rep ID: 5447

Representation ID: 5203

COMMENT Mr Terence Gray

Summary:

Defined and calculated need not gussswork

More details about Rep ID: 5203

Representation ID: 5103

COMMENT Stradbroke Parish Council (Odile Wladon)

Summary:

10 years from plan sign off if target to date has not been met.

More details about Rep ID: 5103

Representation ID: 5102

COMMENT Mrs Rosemary Jones

Summary:

Improvements in infrastructure could enable more development on reserve sites that have been identified.

More details about Rep ID: 5102

Representation ID: 4948

COMMENT Pinewood Parish Council (Mrs Sandra Peartree)

Summary:

No triggers should be set.

More details about Rep ID: 4948

Representation ID: 4888

COMMENT Nedging with Naughton Parish Council (Miss LYNN ALLUM)

Summary:

Failure to commence approved development expeditiously.

More details about Rep ID: 4888

Representation ID: 4559

COMMENT Lavenham Parish Council (Carroll Reeve)

Summary:

The danger of setting triggers is that where planning permissions have been granted but are not coming forward for development, thus the trigger may be prematurely released. This could lead to further permissions being unnecessarily sought.

More details about Rep ID: 4559

Representation ID: 4484

OBJECT Mr Carroll Reeve

Summary:

The danger of setting triggers is that where planning permissions have been granted but are not coming forward for development, thus the trigger may be prematurely released. This could lead to further permissions being unnecessarily sought.

More details about Rep ID: 4484

Representation ID: 4124

OBJECT Holton St Mary Parish Council (Ms Dorothy Steeds )

Summary:

We do not consider the establishment of reserve sites to be appropriate.

More details about Rep ID: 4124

Representation ID: 3843

COMMENT Mr John Bellwood

Summary:

Reserve sites should be considered when something prevents an originally-identified site from being developed within the intended time scale. If there is a need to bring reserve site(s) forward, these should be instead of, not as well as, the originally-intended site(s).

More details about Rep ID: 3843

Representation ID: 3750

COMMENT Mrs Louise Baldry

Summary:

Reserve sites to be replacements NOT additional sites, original sites should be taken out of the plan. Regular review of demand if required checking the guiding principles of type, place, tenure and need

More details about Rep ID: 3750

Representation ID: 3652

OBJECT Mr Neil Lister

Summary:

You should not have reserve sites! The housing allocation set out in the agreed Local Plan = the allocation. End of story.

More details about Rep ID: 3652

Representation ID: 3515

COMMENT Mr Richard Howard

Summary:

Total effect of BREXIT to be assessed before any permission given

More details about Rep ID: 3515

Representation ID: 3409

COMMENT Mr John Kitson

Summary:

Reserve sites should be considered when something prevents an originally-identified site from being developed within the intended time scale. If there is a need to bring reserve site(s) forward, these should be instead of, not as well as, the originally-intended site(s).
* Reserve sites should be considered when something prevents an originally-identified site from being developed within the intended time scale.
* If there is a need to bring reserve site(s) forward, these should be instead of, not as well as, the originally-intended site(s).

More details about Rep ID: 3409

Representation ID: 2850

COMMENT Diss & District Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group (Ms Deborah Sarson)

Summary:

The risk of failing to maintain a five year housing land supply.

More details about Rep ID: 2850

Representation ID: 2831

COMMENT Mr Andrew Coxhead

Summary:

Reserve Sites should meet the requirements of the Strategic Plans

More details about Rep ID: 2831

Representation ID: 2806

COMMENT Mr Simon Wood

Summary:

Location within established infrastructure.
In sympathy with surroundings

More details about Rep ID: 2806

Representation ID: 2776

COMMENT Felsham Parish Council (Mrs Paula Gladwell)

Summary:

Allocated sites should be completed before any reserve site is brought forward. Use brownfield before green and prioritise sites within settlement boundaries.

More details about Rep ID: 2776

Representation ID: 2560

COMMENT Cockfield Parish Council (Mr Doug Reed)

Summary:

Cockfield Parish Council believes there should be a clear demonstration of sustainability plus an evidence of need.

More details about Rep ID: 2560

Representation ID: 2368

COMMENT Chelmondiston PC (Mrs Rosie Kirkup)

Summary:

Reserved sites should only be released if the delivery of housing is significantly off target or if there is a need for suitable housing due to appropriate business expansion. If land is offered for low cost housing, guarantees should be obtained that they remain within the social housing system and not sold off. More interaction with Parish Councils is needed.

More details about Rep ID: 2368

Representation ID: 2364

COMMENT Fressingfield Parish Council (Mr Alexander Day)

Summary:

It is the Parish Council's view that no contingency should be applied to housing requirement and consequently this question is broadly irrelevant given the potential over delivery of housing identified previously in this response.
In general terms it is felt by the Parish Council that the measurement of progress should always be considered over a rolling three year programme rather than reacting year by year. One year is statistically insufficient to allow for fluctuation in housing delivery and is far more predictable measured over a three year cycle.

More details about Rep ID: 2364

Representation ID: 2130

COMMENT Capel St Mary Parish Council (Mrs Julie Lawes)

Summary:

Before contingency sites come forward all existing sites for which permission has been granted must be given priority or permission revoked. Removal of priority sites due e.g. to change of ownership meaning land is withdrawn.

More details about Rep ID: 2130

Representation ID: 2042

COMMENT Mrs Kathie Guthrie

Summary:

Quick wins when we know we could get early development

More details about Rep ID: 2042

Representation ID: 1978

COMMENT Mrs Tania Farrow

Summary:

If the current agreed sites will not deliver the required number of houses due to under delivery or delays on existing sites which cannot be influenced

More details about Rep ID: 1978

Representation ID: 1906

COMMENT Palgrave Parish Council (Sarah Foote)

Summary:

The risk of not maintaining a five year housing land supply.

More details about Rep ID: 1906

Representation ID: 1801

COMMENT Debenham Parish Council (Mr Richard Blackwell)

Summary:

Close monitoring of the above in Q9. Failure to deliver should
have real consequences for developers accepting this would
need a change in national planning policy and any deletion
of a previously allocated site would be rigorously challenged by the big house builders through the planning / legal system.

More details about Rep ID: 1801

Representation ID: 1735

COMMENT Mr Richard Blackwell

Summary:

Close monitoring of the above in Q9. Failure to deliver should
have real consequences for developers accepting this would
need a change in national planning policy and any deletion
of a previously allocated site would be rigorously challenged by the big house builders through the planning / legal system.

More details about Rep ID: 1735

Representation ID: 1693

COMMENT Battisford Parish Council (Mr Chris Knock)

Summary:

In hinterland villages such as ours there should be an extra factor considered of the current long view look of the site in question. We have some eyesores in the village which we would like to see the look of improved through appropriate development.

More details about Rep ID: 1693

Representation ID: 1647

COMMENT Hoxne Parish Council (Mrs Sara Foote)

Summary:

No comment

More details about Rep ID: 1647

Representation ID: 1538

COMMENT Mrs Elizabeth Schmitt

Summary:

Consultation with local Parish Councils if MSDC falls below the number of houses required

More details about Rep ID: 1538

Representation ID: 1518

SUPPORT Mr. A. Breen

Summary:

The sudden and immediate need for additional housing following the relocation of or the establishment of significant employment opportunities.

More details about Rep ID: 1518

Representation ID: 1452

COMMENT Barton Willmore Planning P'ship (Mr. Paul Foster)

Summary:

An underperformance of the housing delivery target for any one year should trigger the release of one or more reserve sites to make up the shortfall. Council's should be seeking to establish a solid five year housing land supply rather than constantly being on the borderline. We also suggest that those reserve sites which are located close to core villages and which support sustainable development should be the focus of release.

The standardised methodology will, if adopted, increase the OAHN and further sites would need to be released to allow housing targets to be met.

More details about Rep ID: 1452

Representation ID: 1389

COMMENT Mr Alf Hannan

Summary:

When local business are introduced in the area

More details about Rep ID: 1389

Representation ID: 1227

COMMENT Raydon Parish Council (Mrs Jane Cryer)

Summary:

When supply forecast for next five year period is identified as falling behind demand forecast then sites should be brought forward.

More details about Rep ID: 1227

Representation ID: 1084

OBJECT Simon Bell

Summary:

I do not agree with the premise of this question as it presupposes that the Council's preferred option will be adopted.

If there is no contingency set, because the Council has adopted an "infrastructure-led" approach to housing site allocation, there is no need for any "triggers" to bring forward reserve sites.

More details about Rep ID: 1084

Representation ID: 1016

COMMENT Great Ashfield PC (arthur peake)

Summary:

trigger will be employment led, particularly for town or core areas.

More details about Rep ID: 1016

Representation ID: 964

COMMENT Mr. Gerald Battye

Summary:

The use of Housing Needs surveys for individual Parishes or appropriate wards

More details about Rep ID: 964

Representation ID: 936

COMMENT Mr Roy Barker

Summary:

When allocated sites are not coming forward for what reasons the reserved sites take their place.

More details about Rep ID: 936

Representation ID: 792

COMMENT Supporters Against Fressingfield Expansion (SAFE) (Dr John Castro)

Summary:

If significant local employment opportunities arose, then additional local housing on reserved sites should be considered.

More details about Rep ID: 792

Representation ID: 528

SUPPORT Redgrave Parish Council (Mr John Giddings)

Summary:

RPC considers that activation of triggers should be limited to those reflecting locally identified housing shortages before other reserve sites are brought forward.

More details about Rep ID: 528

Representation ID: 169

COMMENT Mr D C Warren

Summary:

When there is unplanned expansion of businesses in the area and where there is a lack of suitable housing to meet this need.

More details about Rep ID: 169

Representation ID: 109

COMMENT Mrs Sara Knight

Summary:

The identification by local parish councils of a need for affordable housing.

More details about Rep ID: 109

Representation ID: 73

COMMENT J. E. Knock & Partners (Mr. Chris Knock)

Summary:

Ask parish councils to list the eyesores in their village, and that list is then available for planners to refer to as they review planning applications

More details about Rep ID: 73

Having trouble using the system? Visit our help page or contact us directly.

Powered by OpusConsult