Home > Planning > Planning Policy

PLEASE NOTE: You only need to register / login if you wish to make representations.

You can view the full details of a representation by clicking either on the Representation ID in the top right of the summary box or on the More Details... link at the bottom.

Representations on BMSDC Joint Local Plan Consultation Document (Interactive) - Q27

Representation ID: 16153

COMMENT Paul Reeley

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 16153

Representation ID: 16131

COMMENT Ms. Perpetua Ratcliffe

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 16131

Representation ID: 16109

COMMENT Mr P. Pollard

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 16109

Representation ID: 16087

COMMENT Mrs Natalie Brook

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 16087

Representation ID: 16065

COMMENT Mrs J. Pollard

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 16065

Representation ID: 16043

COMMENT Mr Gavin Brook

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 16043

Representation ID: 16021

COMMENT Mr Michael Hills

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 16021

Representation ID: 15999

COMMENT Mrs Helena Knight

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15999

Representation ID: 15977

COMMENT Mr Roger Knight

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15977

Representation ID: 15955

COMMENT Mrs J. A. Moore

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15955

Representation ID: 15933

COMMENT Miss Jane Anne Moore

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15933

Representation ID: 15911

COMMENT Mr John Moore

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15911

Representation ID: 15889

COMMENT Mr Dennis John Griggs

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15889

Representation ID: 15867

COMMENT Miss Hockley

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15867

Representation ID: 15845

COMMENT Mr Castle

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15845

Representation ID: 15823

COMMENT Mrs Linda Rowntree

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15823

Representation ID: 15801

COMMENT Mr Carl Rowntree

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15801

Representation ID: 15779

COMMENT Miss Patricia Copeman

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15779

Representation ID: 15757

COMMENT Mr Barry Pearce

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15757

Representation ID: 15735

COMMENT Mrs Faith Marsden

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15735

Representation ID: 15713

COMMENT Mrs Clare Kiely

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15713

Representation ID: 15691

COMMENT Mr Michael Kiely

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15691

Representation ID: 15669

COMMENT Mrs Patricia Maisey

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15669

Representation ID: 15647

COMMENT Mr John Maisey

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15647

Representation ID: 15625

COMMENT Mrs Dorothy Scrivener

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15625

Representation ID: 15603

COMMENT Mr George Scrivener

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15603

Representation ID: 15581

COMMENT Mrs Linda Dennison

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15581

Representation ID: 15559

COMMENT Mr Ralph W. Godbold

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15559

Representation ID: 15537

COMMENT Mrs Blythe Smith

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15537

Representation ID: 15515

COMMENT Mr Richard Smith

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15515

Representation ID: 15493

COMMENT Mrs G. P. Godbold

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15493

Representation ID: 15471

COMMENT Mr. Giles Godbold

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15471

Representation ID: 15449

COMMENT Mrs Sally Hoskyns

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15449

Representation ID: 15427

COMMENT Mr George Major

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15427

Representation ID: 15405

COMMENT Mrs Audrey Cremer

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15405

Representation ID: 15383

COMMENT Ms. Cindy Hughes

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15383

Representation ID: 15361

COMMENT Mr. Anthony Wickenden

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15361

Representation ID: 15339

COMMENT Mrs Irene Wickenden

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15339

Representation ID: 15317

COMMENT Mrs Jacqueline Cordwell

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15317

Representation ID: 15295

COMMENT Mr Leslie Graham Walter Cremer

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15295

Representation ID: 15273

COMMENT Mr. D.I.O. Johnson

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15273

Representation ID: 15251

COMMENT Mrs D. Johnson

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15251

Representation ID: 15229

COMMENT Anthony & Tracy Keeble

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15229

Representation ID: 15207

COMMENT Mr. John Fensom

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15207

Representation ID: 15185

COMMENT Mr. Alan Cordwell

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15185

Representation ID: 15163

COMMENT Mrs Annette Dovell

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15163

Representation ID: 15141

COMMENT Mr. Martin Hewett

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15141

Representation ID: 15119

COMMENT Ms. Shirley Hewett

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15119

Representation ID: 15097

COMMENT Mrs. Carol Forward

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15097

Representation ID: 15075

COMMENT Mr. Grant Lloyd

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15075

Representation ID: 15053

COMMENT Mrts. Natasha Lloyd

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15053

Representation ID: 15031

COMMENT Mr. John Forward

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15031

Representation ID: 15009

COMMENT Mr. Hoskyns

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 15009

Representation ID: 14987

COMMENT Miss Isabel De Minvielle Devaux

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 14987

Representation ID: 14965

COMMENT Mr. Ian East

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 14965

Representation ID: 14943

COMMENT Ms. Tracy East

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 14943

Representation ID: 14921

COMMENT Ms. Ilona Northall

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 14921

Representation ID: 14899

COMMENT Mr. Alex James Richard May

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 14899

Representation ID: 14877

COMMENT Mr. Richard John May

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 14877

Representation ID: 14855

COMMENT Ms. Kathryn Anne May

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 14855

Representation ID: 14833

COMMENT Ms. Olivia Frances Chloe May

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 14833

Representation ID: 14811

COMMENT Mr. Charles Hogger

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 14811

Representation ID: 14789

COMMENT Ms. Jo-Ann Hogger

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 14789

Representation ID: 14767

COMMENT Mr P. L. Ratcliffe

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 14767

Representation ID: 14745

COMMENT Miss Tracey Durling

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 14745

Representation ID: 14723

COMMENT Mrs Carol Griggs

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 14723

Representation ID: 13237

COMMENT Mr. Artist

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 13237

Representation ID: 13175

COMMENT Taylor Wimpey represented by Boyer Planning (Mr. James Bailey)

Summary:

We consider that a sustainable approach, as set out in the NPPF, should be considered in relation to development in rural areas. This would allow sustainable sites that are otherwise outside of settlement boundaries to come forward and contribute to the housing land supply.

Sites that are outside, but abutting the settlement boundary should be considered given that they benefit from the services and facilities found in the settlement and are therefore sustainable. More generally they do not often possess the characteristics of the countryside/rural areas, and therefore could be developable land.

More details about Rep ID: 13175

Representation ID: 12856

COMMENT Persimmon Homes (Anglia) (Ms Laura Townes)

Summary:

Option RG2, which proposes that sites should be allocated in towns and core villages is supported. However, the plan should not artificially constrain growth where sustainable development sites could come forward as windfall where it can be demonstrated that there is capacity in the infrastructure and the adverse impacts do not outweigh the benefits. Therefore, the plan should also include a criteria based policy to make it clear that development which is sustainable and be approved without delay in accordance with the NPPF, enabling flexibility to respond to local demand and significantly boost the supply of housing.

More details about Rep ID: 12856

Representation ID: 12490

COMMENT Taylor Wimpey represented by Boyer Planning (Ms Libby Hindle)

Summary:

We consider that a sustainable approach, as set out in the NPPF, should be considered in relation to development in rural areas. This would allow sustainable sites that are otherwise outside of settlement boundaries to come forward and contribute to the housing land supply.

Sites that are outside, but abutting the settlement boundary should be considered given that they benefit from the services and facilities found in the settlement and are therefore sustainable. More generally they do not often possess the characteristics of the countryside/rural areas, and therefore could be developable land.

More details about Rep ID: 12490

Representation ID: 12396

COMMENT Old Newton Parish Council (Mrs Karen Price)

Summary:

Consider impact of cluster villages and the essential services on health and education.

More details about Rep ID: 12396

Representation ID: 12344

COMMENT Strutt & Parker Farm Ltd. represented by Strutt & Parker (Ms Laura Dudley-Smith)

Summary:

We consider it inappropriate that the options proposed for Rural Growth (RG1 and RG2) focus primarily on housing delivery and growth. The Issues and Options presented at this stage appear to have little consideration for the potential of rural areas to provide new and improved services and facilities to support existing and enlarged market town/village communities that growth options such as BHD2 seek to protect and enhance.

The District has seen growth in rural areas outweigh that in urban areas over recent years, despite allocations being focussed in urban areas. This is clear evidence of the deliverability of smaller scale, often greenfield, sites, which can make use of existing services, facilities and infrastructure without exceeding thresholds that mean additional investment and third party cooperation is required to enable delivery.
See full representation attached.

More details about Rep ID: 12344

Representation ID: 12334

COMMENT Taylor Wimpey represented by Boyer Planning (Mr. James Bailey)

Summary:

We consider that a sustainable approach, as set out in the NPPF, should be considered in relation to development in rural areas. This would allow sustainable sites that are otherwise outside of settlement boundaries to come forward and contribute to the housing land supply.

Sites that are outside, but abutting the settlement boundary should be considered given that they benefit from the services and facilities found in the settlement and are therefore sustainable. More generally they do not often possess the characteristics of the countryside/rural areas, and therefore could be developable land.

More details about Rep ID: 12334

Representation ID: 12262

COMMENT R G Williams Ltd represented by Gardner Planning (Mr Geoff Gardner)

Summary:

greater emphasis should be given to growth at Core Villages to reflect this section of the CD rather than the 'spatial distribution' of earlier section.

More details about Rep ID: 12262

Representation ID: 12231

COMMENT Marden Homes represented by Strutt & Parker (Ms Laura Dudley-Smith)

Summary:

As discussed above, there should be serious consideration of the settlement boundaries of Core Villages for developments which are proportionate in size to the respective settlements. Whilst this may constitute more than 'infill' development, it would allow the allocation of deliverable sites and provide a predictable and reliable level of growth outside of the Ipswich fringe and other principal urban areas. Modest extensions to these settlements should be considered for their ability to support the vitality of rural areas whilst not putting undue pressure on the existing facilities, services and local infrastructure, or where appropriate, providing opportunities for the new or improved facilities. Support should be given to sites that are brought forward that are consistent with the overall objectives of Neighbourhood Plans.

More details about Rep ID: 12231

Representation ID: 11953

COMMENT Fieldens Ltd represented by Boyer Planning (Mr. James Bailey)

Summary:

There are additional opportunities in distributing development in rural areas, such as our client's site at Starhouse Lane, Onehouse. As set out further below, this has economic, social and environmental benefits and should be considered for allocation as part of the Local Plan.

More details about Rep ID: 11953

Representation ID: 11816

OBJECT Amber REI represented by Pegasus Group (Mr David Onions)

Summary:

In addition to hamlets, as set out in previous representations made on behalf of the owners of the poultry processing factory at Haughley Park special recognition should be given to previously developed sites located outside settlements which nonetheless could deliver significant planning benefits as well as sustainable development. This should be identified as a further criterion in locational based policies which would control new development.

More details about Rep ID: 11816

Representation ID: 11783

OBJECT Mr & Mrs Heather & Michael Earey

Summary:

*Smaller developments also assimilate into the rural, scattered hamlet, market town character of the county.
*The present policies are too restrictive on small and individual development, in that what appears to be perfectly acceptable infills and small extensions to village boarders which complement their character without oppressive change have been blocked by planning policies when large estate developments that are oppressive, change the character and destroy the individuality of local communities have been supported.

More details about Rep ID: 11783

Representation ID: 11675

COMMENT Haughley Park Consortium represented by Boyer Planning (Mr. James Bailey)

Summary:

There are additional opportunities in distributing development in rural areas, such as Haughley Park.

As set out in Section 3, this has significant economic, social and environmental benefits and should be considered for allocation as part of the Local Plan.

More details about Rep ID: 11675

Representation ID: 10926

COMMENT Lady Anne Windsor Charity (Deborah Langstaff)

Summary:

No

More details about Rep ID: 10926

Representation ID: 10793

COMMENT Mendlesham Parish Council (Mrs Sharon Jones )

Summary:

No

More details about Rep ID: 10793

Representation ID: 10740

COMMENT Brent Eleigh Parish Council (Mr William Grosvenor)

Summary:

No

More details about Rep ID: 10740

Representation ID: 10717

COMMENT Ms Caroline Powell

Summary:

* It is interesting that small and individual developments which complement the county character have come forward successfully whereas the larger strategic site's drag on. Surely an indication that individual development is for need, and therefore gets done. Whereas national developers build for profit and will hold off until they feel they can get the maximum return with no consideration for need.
* Smaller developments also assimilate into the rural, scattered hamlet, market town character of the county.

More details about Rep ID: 10717

Representation ID: 10648

COMMENT Mrs LP Wheatley

Summary:

If there is substantial rural development this would give rise to people having to travel further to their places of work. This in turn gives rise to more crowded roads and more pollution.
There is no need for more houses in rural areas and open countryside and villages. the landscape will be spoilt for future generations.

More details about Rep ID: 10648

Representation ID: 10291

COMMENT Taylor Wimpey represented by Boyer Planning (Kate Kerrigan)

Summary:

We consider that a sustainable approach, as set out in the NPPF, should be considered in relation to development in rural areas. This would allow sustainable sites that are otherwise outside of settlement boundaries to come forward and contribute to the housing land supply.
Sites that are outside, but abutting the settlement boundary should be considered given that they benefit from the services and facilities found in the settlement and are therefore sustainable. More generally they do not often possess the characteristics of the countryside/rural areas, and therefore could be developable land.

More details about Rep ID: 10291

Representation ID: 10068

COMMENT Historic England (Katie Parsons)

Summary:

The distribution of development should take into account the unique and locally specific rural environment of the two districts and should consider the wider landscape implications upon the rural historic environment and upon the setting of the numerous heritage assets it contains.

More details about Rep ID: 10068

Representation ID: 9931

COMMENT Mr Frank Lawrenson

Summary:

Whether Core or Hinterland there should be only a percentage increase in village size, previous development in the village must be taken into account and the effect on the existing community carefully considered.
Density and proportion of new development key ingredients
Government guidelines relating to local character and distinctiveness to be followed
Clear differences between amount of development for urban, rural and village settings
Percentage increase so that no village receives disproportionate growth
Previous development must be taken into account

More details about Rep ID: 9931

Representation ID: 9900

COMMENT Mr Frank Lawrenson

Summary:

Local landscapes must be protected. Conservation areas, sites of Outstanding Natural Beauty and of Special Scientific Interest must be protected with clear guidelines. Development needs to go where there is appropriate infrastructure. Sustainability must refer to the natural environment not merely to housing. Large housing estates are inappropriate for rural villages whether Core or Hinterland. Smaller developments should be spread evenly across all villages, restricted to a small percentage of the existing number of dwellings.

More details about Rep ID: 9900

Representation ID: 9718

COMMENT Miss R P Baillon

Summary:

Yes. Open meetings together with Parish Councils should be held in the settlement concerned to obtain the views of the inhabitants and the results of these meetings should be presented to the Councillors who come to the settlement in question. Even if Council members visit settlements on several occasions they will never be in a position to imbibe the current situation as seen by the inhabitants.

More details about Rep ID: 9718

Representation ID: 9648

COMMENT Mr Chris Marshall

Summary:

I would support a limit on development at a level that does not dramatically change any community. with every effort made to preserve the best of the local landscape, views and ecology.

More details about Rep ID: 9648

Representation ID: 9546

COMMENT Cllr John Hinton

Summary:

Neighbourhood Plans once "made" should be sacrosanct and in violet when determining applications.

More details about Rep ID: 9546

Representation ID: 9528

COMMENT Mrs Mel Seager

Summary:

It is interesting that small and individual developments which complement the county character have come forward successfully whereas the larger strategic sites drag on. Surely an indication that individual development is best for need, and therefore gets done. Whereas national developers build for profit and will hold off until they feel they can get the maximum return with no consideration for need.
Smaller developments also assimilate into the rural, scattered hamlet, market town character of the county.

More details about Rep ID: 9528

Representation ID: 9391

COMMENT Beyton Parish Council (Ms Adele Pope)

Summary:

We believe the approach of a top-down allocation seems reasonable - starting with towns and ending with hamlets, but it is difficult to comment on the rural distribution approach until the criteria are defined. The criteria should reflect not only the village itself, but the context of the village within the area. For example, from a Beyton point of view the proximity to Bury, transit routes through the village from other villages, geographic and infrastructure limitations (sewers, broadband, etc.) should all be taken into account.

More details about Rep ID: 9391

Representation ID: 9125

COMMENT Mr Bay Knowles represented by Keymer Cavendish Limited (Mr Edward Keymer)

Summary:

More support for residential conversion of farm buildings

More details about Rep ID: 9125

Representation ID: 9040

COMMENT Simon Bell

Summary:

Consideration should be given to dualling the A140, bypassing key villages, as this will create spaces for housing and employment development.

Additionally, consideration should be given to development close to current rail infrastructure, where existing core villages could be expanded.

More details about Rep ID: 9040

Representation ID: 8788

COMMENT Mr Philip Schofield

Summary:

Yes - allocation of housing land only where there is (committed/planned) accompanying employment. While likely to be small scale, this will lead to more employment distribution, spreading the associated housing requirement over more communities - avoiding swamping the unfortunate few

More details about Rep ID: 8788

Representation ID: 8633

COMMENT Redlingfield parish meeting (Ms Janet Norman-Philips)

Summary:

New development and housing should be distributed across the district including small villages and hamlets.
It should not just be infill within the settlement boundary but should be allowed outside the settlement boundary on a case by case basis where it is supported by the local community.

More details about Rep ID: 8633

Representation ID: 8580

COMMENT Mr David Pettitt represented by Keymer Cavendish Limited (Philippa Hull)

Summary:

More support for residential conversion of farm buildings.

More details about Rep ID: 8580

Representation ID: 8367

COMMENT Acton Parish Council (Mr Paul MacLachlan)

Summary:

In order to protect the demand on limited local infrastructure, the Council recommends that, during the period 2014 to 2036 the housing stock within Hinterland Villages should not increase by more than 10%.
The Parish Council has made a separate submission on this issue.

More details about Rep ID: 8367

Representation ID: 8360

COMMENT Sproughton Parish Council (Mrs Susan Frankis)

Summary:

Refer to qtn 26.
We suggest the Councils consult on this section in greater depth and reconsider the premises on which the JLP options are based. Overall we consider they are too restrictive and result in too many instances of "unintended consequences." Is there, for example any practical reason why hamlets that could be considered for proportional enlargement should be road facing and of more than 10 houses when the county has clusters on unadopted roads, away from the highway, that could be sensitively enlarged? Merit based criteria would be required and due consideration should be given to the neighbourhood viewpoints. Such locations might be ideal for genuine self-build projects where the builder is likely to want to be a good neighbour.

More details about Rep ID: 8360

Representation ID: 8324

OBJECT Ms Lesley Paris

Summary:

There is too big a gap between Town/urban area and Core Village, especially for the smaller villages just above 18 points.
The current hierarchy of Key Service Centres, Primary and Secondary villages makes more sense and should be retained.

More details about Rep ID: 8324

Representation ID: 8223

COMMENT Ms Helen Davies

Summary:

Why limit development to Hamlets of 10 or more.
One new home in every ten is close to the 9% housing need identified.
Provided proportionality and design sympathetic to the character of other buildings and the landscape was employed proportionate development would appear to be what is fair/needed.
Families have children who grow up and start their own families. Generally that happens to us all so why should the burden of development not equally fall on us all.
Wherever it falls it should be done with every effort made to preserve the best of the local landscape, views and ecology.

More details about Rep ID: 8223

Representation ID: 8129

COMMENT Botesdale & Rickinghall CAP Group (Mr. William Sargeant)

Summary:

The flexibility of RG2 should be adequate. It would be enhanced by including some limit on the size of individual developments in proportion to the size of the host community to ensure that the character of the community is not distorted by new developments.

More details about Rep ID: 8129

Representation ID: 7646

COMMENT Mr Peter Powell

Summary:

* Why limit development to Hamlets of 10 or more.
* One new home in every ten is close to the 9% housing need identified.
* Proportionality and design sympathetic to the character of other buildings and the landscape would appear to be what is fair and needed.
* Families have children who want a home, so why should the burden of development not equally fall on us all.
* But wherever it falls it should be done with every effort made to preserve the best of the local landscape, views and ecology.

More details about Rep ID: 7646

Representation ID: 7607

COMMENT Mrs Annette Brennand

Summary:

The number of houses should not be the driver for development; a broader range of factors should influence the determination of whether development should occur and on what scale (in some locations - if at all).

More details about Rep ID: 7607

Representation ID: 7438

COMMENT Dr DAVID Brennand

Summary:

The number of houses should not be the driver for development; a broader range of factors should influence the determination of whether development should occur and on what scale (in some locations - if at all).

More details about Rep ID: 7438

Representation ID: 7370

COMMENT Mr Mark Blackwell

Summary:

Community self build. Allow groups of individuals, or existing communities, to buld their own developments rather than rely on large developers. If public funds are made available, use these to support communities rather than support developers profits.

More details about Rep ID: 7370

Representation ID: 7355

COMMENT Freston Parish Council (Ms Elizabeth Aldous)

Summary:

What is important in the rural community? This needs to be investigated. Villages are small settlements with their own history, landscape and architecture.

More details about Rep ID: 7355

Representation ID: 7235

COMMENT Great Waldingfield PC (Mr Cecil Allard)

Summary:

Some villages have already had substantial development and further development would a risk to their identity.

More details about Rep ID: 7235

Representation ID: 7177

COMMENT Mr Bernard Rushton

Summary:

Local landscapes and views must be protected. In the same way councils issue requests for developmnent sites, they should also issue requests for landscapes and views to be protected from development. Also Conservation Areas, Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty, Sites of Special Scientific Interest and Visually Important Open Spaces must all be protected with clear and unambiguous guidelines. Development should go where there is already suitable sufficient infrastructure. Sustainability must also refer to the natural environment and not just to housing. Large developments are inappropriate for any villages; smaller scales ones should be spread out evenly, sparingly and proportionally

More details about Rep ID: 7177

Representation ID: 6741

COMMENT ms sally sparrow

Summary:

Why limit development to Hamlets of 10 or more
One new house in every 10 is close to the 9% housing need identified
Provided proportionality and design sympathic to the character of other buildings and the landscape was used proportionare development would appear to be fair and needed.
Families have children who grow up and start their own families...this applies everywhere so the burden of development should be spread equally
Every effort should be made to preserve local landscape, landmarks and ecology.

More details about Rep ID: 6741

Representation ID: 6594

COMMENT Denham Parish Council (Sarah Foote)

Summary:

Denham Parish Council does not support this.

More details about Rep ID: 6594

Representation ID: 6528

COMMENT Mr Alan Lewis

Summary:

The approach of a top-down allocation seems reasonable - starting with towns and ending with hamlets, but it is difficult to comment on the rural distribution approach until the criteria are defined. The criteria should reflect not only the village itself, but the context of the village within the area. For example from a Beyton point of view the proximity to Bury, transit routes through the village from other villages, geographic and infrastructure limitations (sewers, broadband, etc. ) should all be taken into account.

More details about Rep ID: 6528

Representation ID: 6491

COMMENT MSDC Green Group (Cllr John Matthissen)

Summary:

Need to consider numbers of housing in relation to size of settlement and set a limit for rural areas.

More details about Rep ID: 6491

Representation ID: 6007

COMMENT KBB (Keep Bildeston Beautiful) (John Beales)

Summary:

It would be economically advantageous overall to encourage greater provision of bungalows within planning applications. These would enable older people to down-size and remain within their local area, freeing up (usually) larger, existing and more expensive properties.

More details about Rep ID: 6007

Representation ID: 5933

COMMENT Little Waldingfield Parish Council (Mr Andy Sheppard)

Summary:

Nothing immediately springs to mind.

More details about Rep ID: 5933

Representation ID: 5743

COMMENT Mr Adrian James

Summary:

Do not allow development in rural areas so they remain rural

More details about Rep ID: 5743

Representation ID: 5717

COMMENT Mr Carroll Reeve

Summary:

Consideration needs to be given to particular circumstances and the ability of a rural community to absorb an increase in the number of dwellings arising from a development. Any development needs to be defined by size, density and the benefit to the local economy and environment

More details about Rep ID: 5717

Representation ID: 5563

COMMENT Pinewood Parish Council (Mrs Sandra Peartree)

Summary:

None.

More details about Rep ID: 5563

Representation ID: 5001

COMMENT Brantham Parish Council (Mrs Sarah Keys)

Summary:

Cumulative impact should be considered as a material consideration, based on outstanding permissions and build out. A policy should be added to take account of this.

More details about Rep ID: 5001

Representation ID: 4910

COMMENT Nedging with Naughton Parish Council (Miss LYNN ALLUM)

Summary:

No

More details about Rep ID: 4910

Representation ID: 4892

OBJECT Mr Iain Maxwell

Summary:

I do not agree with the proposed alteration to the settlement hierarchy. The range of new Core Villages is too wide - some have very few key facilities (just above the threshold) while others have a large range of facilities. The proposed criteria are too limited and need more clarification. How is it possible to group a small village like Norton in the same category as Stowupland (due to get several hundred new houses)?
Suggest maintain current structure similar to other districts.

More details about Rep ID: 4892

Representation ID: 4639

COMMENT Woolverstone Parish Council (Mr Simon Pearce)

Summary:

Importance of rural communities: tranquility, disconnectedness, landscape, wildlife etc. Needs to be protected from creeping urbanisation

More details about Rep ID: 4639

Representation ID: 4637

COMMENT Lavenham Parish Council (Carroll Reeve)

Summary:

Consideration needs to be given to particular circumstances and the ability of a rural community to absorb an increase in the number of dwellings arising from a development. Any development needs to be defined by size, density and the benefit to the local economy and environment.

More details about Rep ID: 4637

Representation ID: 4492

COMMENT Kersey Parish Council (Mrs Sarah Partridge)

Summary:

No other approaches to distributing development in rural areas should be considered.

More details about Rep ID: 4492

Representation ID: 4373

COMMENT Mrs Louise Baldry

Summary:

Why limit development to Hamlets of 10 or more.
One new home in ten is close to the 9% housing need identified.
Provided proportionality and design sympathetic to character of other buildings and the landscape was employed proportionate development would appear to be what is fair and needed.
Families have children who grow up and start their own families.
Generally that happens to us all so why should the burden of development not equally fall on us all. Wherever it falls it should be done with every effort made to preserve the best of the local landscape, views and ecology.

More details about Rep ID: 4373

Representation ID: 4240

COMMENT Holton St Mary Parish Council (Ms Dorothy Steeds )

Summary:

No.

More details about Rep ID: 4240

Representation ID: 4217

COMMENT Mrs Rhona Jermyn

Summary:

Growth is important in order to support community based employment, changing needs and vitality and viability of communities. Flexible approach to allocating small sites. Predicted homes growth need across Babergh is 9%, this is equivalent to permitting 1-2 new homes in a small hamlet and village including ribbon development. Propagate this across the whole district and you have the growth combined with more sympathetic organic community growth.

More details about Rep ID: 4217

Representation ID: 4206

COMMENT Mrs Sheila Hurdwell

Summary:

No

More details about Rep ID: 4206

Representation ID: 4020

OBJECT Mr John Bellwood

Summary:

* Why limit development to Hamlets of 10 or more.
* One new home in every ten is close to the 9% housing need identified.
* Provided proportionality and design sympathetic to the character of other buildings and the landscape was employed proportionate development would appear to be what is fair and needed.

More details about Rep ID: 4020

Representation ID: 3674

SUPPORT Mr Neil Lister

Summary:

Development in countryside/rural areas should be welcomed and possible if new development and indeed entire new villages bring quality landscape and building standards. ID villages/hamlets where small scale, sensitive development will be allowed to help meet local demand. Allow sensitive re-use of existing traditional buildings, essential agricultural workers dwellings.

Encourage and support occupation and working of small landholdings, tenanted or owner occupied, especially those with a social inclusion/educational element. The high costs of land and rural housing make it near impossible for new entrants to establish a rural land based business. Affordable/secure smallholdings address this.

More details about Rep ID: 3674

Representation ID: 3438

COMMENT Mr John Kitson

Summary:

* Why limit development to Hamlets of 10 or more.
* One new home in every ten is close to the 9% housing need identified.
* Provided proportionality and design sympathetic to the character of other buildings and the landscape was employed proportionate development would appear to be what is fair and needed.
* Families have children who grow up and start their own families.
* Generally that happens to us all so why should the burden of development not equally fall on us all.
* But wherever it falls it should be done with every effort made to preserve the best of the local landscape, views and ecology.

More details about Rep ID: 3438

Representation ID: 3426

COMMENT Fressingfield Parish Council (Mr Alexander Day)

Summary:

National policies/guidelines set out that development should be distributed in a way that firstly reduces the need to travel, secondly supports the retention of existing services and thirdly helps to sustain rural areas. It appears that the District Council has either failed to consider these three principals or disregarded them in the past to allow such a skewed emphasis on the urban/rural housing provision ratio. We would propose that a moratorium be imposed on developments of other than windfall in core and hinterland communities until a more reasonable proportion of developments between urban and rural communities has been met.

More details about Rep ID: 3426

Representation ID: 3305

COMMENT Braiseworth Hall Farms Limited represented by Evolution Town Planning (Mr David Barker)

Summary:

As currently worded, policy RG 2 does not make provision for appropriate
allocations in the hinterland villages and this should be included in the Local Plan.
Beyond allocations, the criteria based approach should not be restrictive and should
seek to promote sustainable development in line with The Framework. As such, the
criteria should include consideration of the nearby settlements and services and
facilities when considering the suitability of sites.

More details about Rep ID: 3305

Representation ID: 3289

COMMENT Drinkstone Parish Council (Mrs Daphne Youngs)

Summary:

Look back to the spatial strategy. The thrust of the rural growth section of the report leads one to assume that Option MHD2, market town/rural area balance, is what will be chosen. This the familiar option. However it does not address the resultant infrastructure issues such as poor secondary roads, poor broadband, lack of mains drainage and mains gas, inadequate public transport.

More details about Rep ID: 3289

Representation ID: 3247

COMMENT Mrs Tania Farrow

Summary:

No

More details about Rep ID: 3247

Representation ID: 2867

COMMENT Diss & District Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group (Ms Deborah Sarson)

Summary:

The DDNP will have to take into consideration the local housing requirement and mixes of type and tenure as appropriate not only to the DDNP Area but to the individual settlements within it

Crucial to that it may decide that development should be proportionate and appropriate whilst also intended to ensure the continued viability of a settlement or community.

More details about Rep ID: 2867

Representation ID: 2618

COMMENT Cockfield Parish Council (Mr Doug Reed)

Summary:

Cockfield Parish Council considers that there are no other options.

More details about Rep ID: 2618

Representation ID: 2282

COMMENT Chelmondiston PC (Mrs Rosie Kirkup)

Summary:

In Hinterland Villages and Hamlet areas development should only be permitted in response to local need, in sympathetic way to blend with existing built up area.

More details about Rep ID: 2282

Representation ID: 2226

COMMENT Battisford Parish Council (Mr Chris Knock)

Summary:

In Battisford we are interested in being able to tidy up unsightly, redundant and dilapidated buildings so a provision to allow applications for new uses of rurally located brown field sites would be most welcome.

More details about Rep ID: 2226

Representation ID: 2144

COMMENT Capel St Mary Parish Council (Mrs Julie Lawes)

Summary:

New Town development as mentioned earlier. Better utilisation of strategic sites already identified.

More details about Rep ID: 2144

Representation ID: 1925

COMMENT Palgrave Parish Council (Sarah Foote)

Summary:

No.

More details about Rep ID: 1925

Representation ID: 1824

COMMENT Debenham Parish Council (Mr Richard Blackwell)

Summary:

Consider existing and any proposed new infrastructure. Many sites being developed do not appear to have sufficient existing infrastructure and no planned developments either.

More details about Rep ID: 1824

Representation ID: 1757

COMMENT Mr Richard Blackwell

Summary:

Consider existing and any proposed new infrastructure. Many sites being developed do not appear to have sufficient existing infrastructure and no planned developments either.

More details about Rep ID: 1757

Representation ID: 1671

COMMENT Hoxne Parish Council (Mrs Sara Foote)

Summary:

Hoxne Parish Council does not wish to comment.

More details about Rep ID: 1671

Representation ID: 1407

COMMENT Mr Alf Hannan

Summary:

No

More details about Rep ID: 1407

Representation ID: 1248

COMMENT Raydon Parish Council (Mrs Jane Cryer)

Summary:

No

More details about Rep ID: 1248

Representation ID: 1142

COMMENT Great Ashfield PC (arthur peake)

Summary:

Must consider that required services and infrastructure exist and can cope - or are planned in tandem.

More details about Rep ID: 1142

Representation ID: 957

COMMENT Mr Roy Barker

Summary:

Development of old farmsteads that have come superseded by modern day farming and are redundant and empty.

More details about Rep ID: 957

Representation ID: 809

COMMENT Supporters Against Fressingfield Expansion (SAFE) (Dr John Castro)

Summary:

There should be an organic approach rather than a Plan based approach.

More details about Rep ID: 809

Representation ID: 402

COMMENT Mr Ralph Carpenter

Summary:

Rural communities are aware that for development to be acceptable in terms of scale, landscape and heritage impact, it needs to be limited to no more than 3 dwellings, and of a size which does not dominate the existing groups of houses. Self build with modestly sized houses would have the greatest support because rural communities are aware of their privileged status and want to encourage a better mix of housing provide a better balance, more opportunities for younger families and support for local facilities

More details about Rep ID: 402

Representation ID: 284

COMMENT Mr Simon Barrett

Summary:

No

More details about Rep ID: 284

Representation ID: 198

COMMENT Mr D C Warren

Summary:

Should consider impact on local farmers as it could lead to major hinderanceto move equipment etc around local area

More details about Rep ID: 198

Having trouble using the system? Visit our help page or contact us directly.

Powered by OpusConsult