Home > Planning > Planning Policy

Niobe

Please note: You only need to register / login if you wish to make representations.

You can view the full details of a representation by clicking either on the Representation ID in the top right of the summary box or on the More Details... link at the bottom.

Representations on BMSDC Joint Local Plan Consultation Document (Interactive) - SS0843 - land south east of Finningham Road

Representation ID: 11310

OBJECT Mr & Mrs R. Siger

Summary:

Site is agricultural land, outside the settlement boundary.

Close to several Grade II listed buildings and would spoil the rural and unspoilt approach to the village. Permission was refused a few metres away was refused (3094/16) for several reasons, including that it would erode the isolated and rural setting of a Grade II listed farmstead and the intrinsic character of the countryside.

On a stretch of road that floods badly after heavy rain. Floodwater collects nearby, and takes several hours to drain as there is no ditch. Building will make the problem worse, possibly flooding our garden.

On a very sharp narrow bend with limited visibility.

More details about Rep ID: 11310

Representation ID: 10243

COMMENT Historic England (Katie Parsons)

Summary:

Two sites are being considered at Gislingham. Both sites are in close proximity to a
number of Grade II listed buildings. The presence of these heritage assets and their
settings should be considered carefully as part of the site allocation process.

More details about Rep ID: 10243

Representation ID: 6671

OBJECT Mr Gordon Lowery

Summary:

We object because:
* It represents encroachment into open countryside
* It will adversely impact rural and heritage setting of the village which features Grade II listed assets 50M away.
* Little or no economic benefit to local area residents or businesses.
* Increased car commuter traffic will need go through the village centre, or head south either via Back Street or Finningham road, both are unsuitable single track rural roads
* A "windfall" parcel of land rear of West View Gardens in Gislingham has recently (2017) been given permission for development of 40 new houses, making this proposal redundant

More details about Rep ID: 6671

Representation ID: 6441

OBJECT Mr Scott Moore

Summary:

We object to the proposal of using this land for housing development. This development is not suitable in this location and would have an inappropriate affect on the intrinsic value and character of this area of open countryside and historic buildings.

More details about Rep ID: 6441

Representation ID: 6431

OBJECT Mr Scott Moore

Summary:

We object to the proposal of using this land for housing development. This development is not suitable in this location and would have an inappropriate affect on the intrinsic value and character of this area of open countryside.

More details about Rep ID: 6431

Representation ID: 5218

OBJECT Jonathan & Penelope Marland

Summary:

We strongly disagree with the proposal to build on the green field site on entry to the village on the Finningham Road. There are multiple reasons why the proposal is not sound when there are other areas that could be used without spoiling the village beyond all measure. A more realistic site, should there have to more houses would be:

1. The enlargement of the proposal on Coldhams lane and on a westerly direction.
2. The infill of Grays Close.

More details about Rep ID: 5218

Representation ID: 3888

OBJECT Mr Peter Rodgers

Summary:

Site SS0843 is outside the proposed new settlement boundary for Gislingham, which encloses a substantial number of potentially better building sites. It is immediately adjacent to a site where a single building was rejected in September 2016 as an unsustainable form of development in open countryside which would "erode the isolated and rural setting of the Grade II listed farmstead " at Rush Green. By pushing into open, unenclosed countryside it makes an unnecessary and damaging intrusion into the well-preserved rural area that creates the attractive southern setting of Gislingham

More details about Rep ID: 3888

Representation ID: 3079

OBJECT Mr Graham Liptrot

Summary:

I object to the proposal of using this land for further housing development. The area in question is of significant historical value which would most certainly be devalued if the development was approved. Should MSDC decide that the village is to be subject of housing growth then less contentious areas need to be identified.

More details about Rep ID: 3079

Representation ID: 2505

OBJECT Mr Steve Justice

Summary:

We oppose this site due to its disproportionate impact on its surroundings, and loss of heritage assets.

More details about Rep ID: 2505

Having trouble using the system? Visit our help page or contact us directly.

Powered by OpusConsult