Home > Planning > Planning Policy

PLEASE NOTE: You only need to register / login if you wish to make representations.

If you haven't got an account you can register now.
If you have forgotten your password you can request a new password.

You can view the full details of a representation by clicking either on the Representation ID in the top right of the summary box or on the More Details... link at the bottom.

Representations on BMSDC Joint Local Plan Consultation Document (Interactive) - Q37

Representation ID: 13180

COMMENT Taylor Wimpey represented by Boyer Planning (Mr. James Bailey)

Summary:

We agree that there should be a policy that allows a wider range of uses than just B class. Land for residential use should be found wherever possible, where suitable. It is acknowledged that land for B class uses is required within the Districts, however land for residential use must always be a priority within the Joint Local Plan.

More details about Rep ID: 13180

Representation ID: 12964

COMMENT Dr Jonathan Tuppen

Summary:

The Councils should also consider operating a database service to assist developers in locating the best and most appropriate location for their business. This should include offers of smaller sites with potential.

More details about Rep ID: 12964

Representation ID: 12497

SUPPORT Taylor Wimpey represented by Boyer Planning (Ms Libby Hindle)

Summary:

We agree that there should be a policy that allows a wider range of uses than just B class. Land for residential use should be found wherever possible, where suitable. It is acknowledged that land for B class uses is required within the Districts, however land for residential use must always be a priority within the Joint Local Plan.

More details about Rep ID: 12497

Representation ID: 12403

OBJECT Old Newton Parish Council (Mrs Karen Price)

Summary:

No

More details about Rep ID: 12403

Representation ID: 12339

SUPPORT Taylor Wimpey represented by Boyer Planning (Mr. James Bailey)

Summary:

We agree that there should be a policy that allows a wider range of uses than just B class. Land for residential use should be found wherever possible, where suitable. It is acknowledged that land for B class uses is required within the Districts, however land for residential use must always be a priority within the Joint Local Plan.

More details about Rep ID: 12339

Representation ID: 11709

COMMENT Haughley Park Consortium represented by Boyer Planning (Mr. James Bailey)

Summary:

it is considered that policies should not be overly restrictive, and therefore should remain flexible to allow a wider range of uses that just B class, where there is an employment generating use.

More details about Rep ID: 11709

Representation ID: 11030

COMMENT Stowmarket Town Council (Ms Michelle Marshall)

Summary:

Stowmarket Town Council believes that dependent upon circumstances, if units cannot be sold/let, then consideration should be given to other uses.

More details about Rep ID: 11030

Representation ID: 10799

SUPPORT Mendlesham Parish Council (Mrs Sharon Jones )

Summary:

Yes but it should be site dependent.

More details about Rep ID: 10799

Representation ID: 10314

SUPPORT Taylor Wimpey represented by Boyer Planning (Kate Kerrigan)

Summary:

We agree that there should be a policy that allows a wider range of uses than just B class. Land for residential use should be found wherever possible, where suitable. It is acknowledged that land for B class uses is required within the Districts, however land for residential use must always be a priority within the Joint Local Plan.

More details about Rep ID: 10314

Representation ID: 9890

OBJECT Dr Ian Russell

Summary:

No. See answer to Q 36.

More details about Rep ID: 9890

Representation ID: 9858

SUPPORT Stowupland Parish Council (Claire Pizzey)

Summary:

Yes for appropriate support businesses (eg childcare, doctors, dentist, vet) but would depend on the class B use. For instance, childcare next to office development is appropriate but not next to heavy manufacturing or warehousing with few employees it is not.

More details about Rep ID: 9858

Representation ID: 9728

COMMENT Miss R P Baillon

Summary:

Careful consideration should be given in every case. Local skills and appropriate sites should be taken into account without exception together with the views of the population adjacent to the site.

More details about Rep ID: 9728

Representation ID: 9446

COMMENT Bacton Parish Council (mrs tina newell)

Summary:

Other Sui Generis uses must be considered on a case by case basis.

More details about Rep ID: 9446

Representation ID: 9115

OBJECT Simon Bell

Summary:

Policies such as this can have a detrimental effect on industrial sites, by, for example allowing too many recreational sites in converted industrial units.

More details about Rep ID: 9115

Representation ID: 9049

COMMENT Onehouse Parish Council (Mrs Peggy Fuller)

Summary:

Yes

More details about Rep ID: 9049

Representation ID: 8806

COMMENT Mr Philip Schofield

Summary:

Yes, on selected employment sites, where their presence does not affect the character of the environment in which they sit (avoiding air, noise, sound, light pollution)

More details about Rep ID: 8806

Representation ID: 8424

COMMENT Sproughton Parish Council (Mrs Susan Frankis)

Summary:

Refer to qtn 33.

More details about Rep ID: 8424

Representation ID: 8385

OBJECT Acton Parish Council (Mr Paul MacLachlan)

Summary:

The Planning Authority should retain discretionary powers as regards the granting of a wide range of uses. It would not be appropriate to assume a wide use is appropriate on all sites.

More details about Rep ID: 8385

Representation ID: 8177

COMMENT Botesdale & Rickinghall CAP Group (Mr. William Sargeant)

Summary:

There needs to be a definition included in the glossary of Employment Sites, since it appears that there in currently no direct relationship between Part B and employment sites which may be covered by Part A. The local plan should include improved categorisation of Part B uses to include more flexible interpretation. (What happened to B3 to B7?)

More details about Rep ID: 8177

Representation ID: 8093

COMMENT Tattingstone Parish Council (mrs Jane Connell-Smith)

Summary:

as long as employment areas are not situated where noise, pollution and increased traffic can impinge or cause a disturbance to residents in the locality.

More details about Rep ID: 8093

Representation ID: 7952

SUPPORT Mr Peter Powell

Summary:

* In our opinion, yes because the commercial market is changing constantly.

More details about Rep ID: 7952

Representation ID: 7526

COMMENT Mx Miles Row

Summary:

Yes for appropriate support businesses (e.g. childcare) but would depend on the class B use. For instance, childcare next to office development is appropriate but not next to heavy manufacturing or warehousing with few employees it is not.

More details about Rep ID: 7526

Representation ID: 7252

COMMENT Great Waldingfield PC (Mr Cecil Allard)

Summary:

. Dependent on local need and requirement.

More details about Rep ID: 7252

Representation ID: 6723

OBJECT Yaxley Parish Council (Mr Philip Freeman)

Summary:

No

More details about Rep ID: 6723

Representation ID: 6603

COMMENT Denham Parish Council (Sarah Foote)

Summary:

Denham Parish Council believes this policy should not be developed.

More details about Rep ID: 6603

Representation ID: 6531

SUPPORT MSDC Green Group (Cllr John Matthissen)

Summary:

Yes for appropriate support businesses (eg childcare) but would depend on the class B use. For instance, childcare next to office development is appropriate but not next to heavy manufacturing or warehousing with few employees it is not. Protection of town centre retail should be paramount.

More details about Rep ID: 6531

Representation ID: 6504

COMMENT Freston Parish Council (Ms Elizabeth Aldous)

Summary:

We do not know

More details about Rep ID: 6504

Representation ID: 5963

COMMENT Little Waldingfield Parish Council (Mr Andy Sheppard)

Summary:

LWPC believes Yes, and that flexibility must be the key.

More details about Rep ID: 5963

Representation ID: 5906

COMMENT Little Cornard Parish Council (Mr Dave Crimmin)

Summary:

Yes

More details about Rep ID: 5906

Representation ID: 5876

SUPPORT Mrs Nicky Willshere

Summary:

Yes

More details about Rep ID: 5876

Representation ID: 5733

SUPPORT Mr Carroll Reeve

Summary:

Flexibility needed and change in work patterns, such as more people working from home and using the home as a base. Provision for secure 'white van' parking needed.

More details about Rep ID: 5733

Representation ID: 5585

COMMENT Pinewood Parish Council (Mrs Sandra Peartree)

Summary:

Yes.

More details about Rep ID: 5585

Representation ID: 5352

SUPPORT Mrs Louise Baldry

Summary:

Yes

More details about Rep ID: 5352

Representation ID: 4927

SUPPORT Nedging with Naughton Parish Council (Miss LYNN ALLUM)

Summary:

Yes

More details about Rep ID: 4927

Representation ID: 4719

COMMENT Woolverstone Parish Council (Mr Simon Pearce)

Summary:

We do not know.

More details about Rep ID: 4719

Representation ID: 4659

SUPPORT Lavenham Parish Council (Carroll Reeve)

Summary:

Yes

More details about Rep ID: 4659

Representation ID: 4253

OBJECT Holton St Mary Parish Council (Ms Dorothy Steeds )

Summary:

No.

More details about Rep ID: 4253

Representation ID: 3686

SUPPORT Mr Neil Lister

Summary:

Flexible approach good.

More details about Rep ID: 3686

Representation ID: 3466

COMMENT Fressingfield Parish Council (Mr Alexander Day)

Summary:

Non B class uses are by nature likely to attract additional heavy goods traffic together with noise and so it is the Parish Council's view that these are restricted to designated areas with good transport links and an existing level of this type of class of industry. They should not be considered unless under exceptional and clearly defined circumstances in other more rural communities.

More details about Rep ID: 3466

Representation ID: 3447

COMMENT Mr John Kitson

Summary:

We are living in a changing world with many unknowns ahead of us. As a nation we are going to have to become more adaptable to meet the challenges; aspects of planning are going to have to become more flexible.

More details about Rep ID: 3447

Representation ID: 3257

COMMENT Mrs Tania Farrow

Summary:

Yes- as long as there are no incompatibilities

More details about Rep ID: 3257

Representation ID: 2918

COMMENT Diss & District Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group (Ms Deborah Sarson)

Summary:

The DDNP will have to take into consideration the local economic growth requirement and uses as appropriate not only to the DDNP Area but to the individual settlements within it.

Proposals will be brought forward at the appropriate time and may provide for a wider range of use classes where they will complement but not conflict with B class uses.

More details about Rep ID: 2918

Representation ID: 2636

OBJECT Cockfield Parish Council (Mr Doug Reed)

Summary:

Cockfield Parish Council would argue no.

More details about Rep ID: 2636

Representation ID: 2289

COMMENT Chelmondiston PC (Mrs Rosie Kirkup)

Summary:

Not in our view.

More details about Rep ID: 2289

Representation ID: 1937

COMMENT Palgrave Parish Council (Sarah Foote)

Summary:

Potentially, but only if any other use classes will complement and not conflict with B class uses.

More details about Rep ID: 1937

Representation ID: 1834

COMMENT Debenham Parish Council (Mr Richard Blackwell)

Summary:

No comment - not enough knowledge.

More details about Rep ID: 1834

Representation ID: 1573

COMMENT Mr Alf Hannan

Summary:

No

More details about Rep ID: 1573

Representation ID: 1259

OBJECT Raydon Parish Council (Mrs Jane Cryer)

Summary:

Hinterland villages and countryside should only accommodate B-class employment sites.

More details about Rep ID: 1259

Representation ID: 1151

COMMENT Great Ashfield PC (arthur peake)

Summary:

Yes, flexibility to encourage employment must be the priority.

More details about Rep ID: 1151

Representation ID: 996

COMMENT Mr Roy Barker

Summary:

yes if it does not conflict with other users ie food industry.

More details about Rep ID: 996

Representation ID: 291

SUPPORT Mr Simon Barrett

Summary:

Yes, we need a flexible approach, old system too rigid, let's be flexible we want employment of good quality.

More details about Rep ID: 291

Representation ID: 212

OBJECT Mr D C Warren

Summary:

No

More details about Rep ID: 212

Representation ID: 122

COMMENT Mrs Sara Knight

Summary:

See infrastructure concerns above.

More details about Rep ID: 122

Representation ID: 82

SUPPORT J. E. Knock & Partners (Mr. Chris Knock)

Summary:

Yes, adds greatly to the flexibility allowed to planners

More details about Rep ID: 82

Having trouble using the system? Visit our help page or contact us directly.

Powered by OpusConsult