Home > Planning > Planning Policy

Niobe

Please note: You only need to register / login if you wish to make representations.

You can view the full details of a representation by clicking either on the Representation ID in the top right of the summary box or on the More Details... link at the bottom.

Representations on BMSDC Joint Local Plan Consultation Document (Interactive) - SS0536 - Land to the east of Norwich Road,

Representation ID: 12167

OBJECT Miss C Smith & Mr L Jones

Summary:

I object to any new building

More details about Rep ID: 12167

Representation ID: 11052

SUPPORT Mr C. Voetmann represented by Savills (Rachael Morey)

Summary:

The site provides a logical extension to an already well established commercial site within the District and importantly acknowledges the role that such sites can play in terms of accommodating important and significant new inward investment as well as being an essential provider of local jobs to the local workforce.

Site is strategically placed along the A140 and provides an alternative to any strategic allocation elsewhere in the District. We would confirm that the site is deliverable within the next 5 years and hope that the officers and Members acknowledge the importance that this site can play to meeting the economic objectives within the plan period.

More details about Rep ID: 11052

Representation ID: 9002

OBJECT Mr Crispin Hall

Summary:

The map is incorrectly pointing to land in Tostock, West Suffolk.

There is already sufficient employment land in existence, further supported by the dormant land already part of the Mendlesham Industrial Estate which has permission but has been vacant for many years and unsuccessfully advertised for the last three years.

Developing agricultural land, which is not only already in use but is also enjoyed as a rural amenity by the residents of the surrounding hamlets surely cannot be supported before brownfield sites are put to reasonable use first.

More details about Rep ID: 9002

Representation ID: 8256

OBJECT Mr Mark Allen

Summary:

The map on your interactive web resource is incorrect and refers to another part of Suffolk. It is therefore not possible to know exactly which parcel is referred to here. However, assuming that 'East of Norwich Road' in Mendlesham refers to land adjacent to the existing Mendlesham industrial estate, I object to the further unwarranted development of what is currently agricultural land. Neither this Plan nor the current economic conditions justify this proposed expansion.

More details about Rep ID: 8256

Representation ID: 8246

OBJECT Mr Crispin Hall

Summary:

The map is incorrectly pointing to land in Tostock, West Suffolk.

There is already sufficient employment land in existence, further supported by the dormant land already part of the Mendlesham Industrial Estate which has permission but has been vacant for many years and unsuccessfully advertised for the last three years.

Developing agricultural land, which is not only already in use but is also enjoyed as a rural amenity by the residents of the surrounding hamlets surely cannot be supported before brownfield sites are put to reasonable use first.

More details about Rep ID: 8246

Representation ID: 8241

OBJECT Mrs Christine Double

Summary:

I object to the change of use of agricultural land for industrial purposes, when there is already land allocated and as yet unoccupied. In my view, the road system in this area is inadequate for large industrial expansion also.

More details about Rep ID: 8241

Representation ID: 8239

OBJECT Mrs Kirsten Bowden

Summary:

This is a rural location and the landscape character and quality of the setting would be significantly detrimentally affected. This is a rural setting of open plateau landscape with an infrastructure of roads which struggles to cope with its existing load. Industrial development here would be out of character and out of scale in this rural setting with far reaching visual impacts. On this basis I strongly object.

More details about Rep ID: 8239

Representation ID: 8055

OBJECT Mr Sam Surl

Summary:

I object to the piecemeal industrialisation of the Suffolk landscape, especially when sufficient land has already been allocated - in more suitable areas - across Suffolk for such industrial development. Brownfield sites and sites with existing infrastructure should always be developed in preference to high quality agricultural land.

More details about Rep ID: 8055

Representation ID: 4331

OBJECT Mr Matthew Bush

Summary:

The description on SHEELA, relates to the land south of Mendlesham industrial estate. The map on the interactive consultation is wrong and is from another part of Mid Suffolk.
I object to the allocation as employment land, as this land is greenfield agricultural land. It is adjacent to an existing unused part of the industrial estate, that I believe has been advertised for let for 36 months. This supports the earlier submission that there is sufficient employment land at this site to accommodate future growth, without expansion that would negatively impact the amenity and rural nature of the area.

More details about Rep ID: 4331

Having trouble using the system? Visit our help page or contact us directly.

Powered by OpusConsult